Literature DB >> 18085355

Cervical mediastinoscopy versus computed tomography for detecting enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes in non-cancerous lung diseases.

Aydin Sanli1, Ahmet Onen, Atila Akkoclu, Erkan Yilmaz, Banu Gokcen, Ahu Hayretdag, Can Sevinc, Aydanur Kargi, Volkan Karaçam, Sami Karapolat, Unal Acikel.   

Abstract

Cervical mediastinoscopy (CM) is considered to be the gold standard for evaluating mediastinal lymph nodes. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic yield of computed tomography (CT) and CM for detecting enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes in non-malignant pulmonary diseases. We retrospectively investigated the correlation and differentiation between chest CT and CM findings in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), in 30 patients with granulomatous lung disease diagnosed by CM and isolated enlarged lymph nodes seen on CT scans. Biopsy tissues from the lymph nodes in stations right, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7, were obtained for pathological examination. The 30 patients comprised 11 men (mean age 47.1 +/- 18.4 years) and 19 women (mean age 44.2 +/- 14.0 years). Radiological examination showed that the diagnostic value of stations 2 and 4 was particularly high. Thus, when CM is used for diagnostic purposes, the small lymph nodes in station 1, obtained by careful dissection of the higher mediastinal region, can be helpful. Generally, there is no absolute consistency between the findings of CM and CT. For this reason, obtaining samples from each station regardless of CT findings is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18085355     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-007-3554-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  7 in total

1.  [Evaluation of the "N" factor in nonsmall cell lung cancer. Correlation between computerized tomography and pathologic anatomy].

Authors:  T Pirronti; G Macis; G Sallustio; L M Minordi; P Granone; F M Vecchio; P Marano
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Clinical value of mediastinoscopy in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis: an analysis of 68 cases.

Authors:  H Yanardağ; M Caner; K Kaynak; S Uygun; S Demirci; T Karayel
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  The role of mediastinoscopy in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  H Porte; D Roumilhac; L Eraldi; C Cordonnier; P Puech; A Wurtz
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Regional lymph node classification for lung cancer staging.

Authors:  C F Mountain; C M Dresler
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Normal mediastinal lymph nodes: number and size according to American Thoracic Society mapping.

Authors:  G M Glazer; B H Gross; L E Quint; I R Francis; F L Bookstein; M B Orringer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  The size of mediastinal lymph nodes and its relation with metastatic involvement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adrianus J de Langen; Pieter Raijmakers; Ingrid Riphagen; Marinus A Paul; Otto S Hoekstra
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Mediastinoscopy vs. anterior mediastinotomy in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphoma: a randomized trial.

Authors:  S Elia; C Cecere; F Giampaglia; G Ferrante
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.191

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.