Literature DB >> 18085298

Intrinsic chemosensitivity of individual nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) and locus coeruleus (LC) neurons from neonatal rats.

Nicole L Nichols1, Lynn K Hartzler, Susan C Conrad, Jay B Dean, Robert W Putnam.   

Abstract

Chemosensitive (CS) neurons are found in discrete brainstem regions, but whether the CS response of these neurons is due to intrinsic chemosensitivity of individual neurons or is mediated by changes in chemical and/or electrical synaptic input is largely unknown. We studied the effect of synaptic blockade (11.4 mM Mg2+/0.2mM Ca2+) solution (SNB) and a gap junction uncoupling agent carbenoxolone (CAR--100 microM) on the response of neurons from two CS brainstem regions, the NTS and the LC. In NTS neurons, SNB decreased spontaneous firing rate (FR). We calculated the magnitude of the FR response to hypercapnic acidosis (HA; 15% CO2) using the Chemosensitivity Index (CI). The percentage of NTS neurons activated and CI were the same in the absence and presence of SNB. Blocking gap junctions with CAR did not significantly alter spontaneous FR. CAR did not alter the CI in NTS neurons and resulted in a small decrease in the percentage of activated neurons, which was most evident in NTS neurons from rats younger than postnatal day 10. In LC neurons, SNB resulted in an increase in spontaneous FR. As with NTS neurons, SNB did not alter the percentage of activated neurons or the CI in LC neurons. CAR resulted in a small increase in spontaneous FR in LC neurons. In contrast, CAR had a marked effect on the response of LC neurons to HA: a reduced percentage of CS LC neurons and decreased CI. In summary, both NTS and LC neurons appear to contain intrinsically CS neurons. CS neurons from the two regions receive different tonic input in slices (excitatory for NTS and inhibitory for LC); however, blocking chemical synaptic input does not affect the CS response in either region. In NTS neurons, gap junction coupling plays a small role in the CS response, but gap junctions play a major role in the chemosensitivity of many LC neurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18085298     DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-73693-8_61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  30 in total

1.  Postnatal development and activation of L-type Ca2+ currents in locus ceruleus neurons: implications for a role for Ca2+ in central chemosensitivity.

Authors:  Ann N Imber; Robert W Putnam
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-03-08

2.  Characterization of the chemosensitive response of individual solitary complex neurons from adult rats.

Authors:  Nicole L Nichols; Daniel K Mulkey; Katherine A Wilkinson; Frank L Powell; Jay B Dean; Robert W Putnam
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Impaired central respiratory chemoreflex in an experimental genetic model of epilepsy.

Authors:  Leonardo T Totola; Ana C Takakura; José Antonio C Oliveira; Norberto Garcia-Cairasco; Thiago S Moreira
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Retrotrapezoid nucleus, respiratory chemosensitivity and breathing automaticity.

Authors:  Patrice G Guyenet; Douglas A Bayliss; Ruth L Stornetta; Michal G Fortuna; Stephen B G Abbott; Seth D DePuy
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 1.931

5.  Novel neuropathologic findings in the Haddad syndrome.

Authors:  Nestor D Tomycz; Robin L Haynes; Edith F Schmidt; Kate Ackerson; Hannah C Kinney
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 17.088

Review 6.  Central chemoreception in wakefulness and sleep: evidence for a distributed network and a role for orexin.

Authors:  Eugene Nattie; Aihua Li
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-02-04

Review 7.  The locus coeruleus and central chemosensitivity.

Authors:  Luciane H Gargaglioni; Lynn K Hartzler; Robert W Putnam
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 1.931

8.  Strain differences in pH-sensitive K+ channel-expressing cells in chemosensory and nonchemosensory brain stem nuclei.

Authors:  Paul F Martino; S Olesiak; D Batuuka; D Riley; S Neumueller; H V Forster; M R Hodges
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-08-21

9.  Chemosensitive Phox2b-expressing neurons are crucial for hypercapnic ventilatory response in the nucleus tractus solitarius.

Authors:  Congrui Fu; Jinyu Xue; Ri Wang; Jinting Chen; Lan Ma; Yixian Liu; Xuejiao Wang; Fang Guo; Yi Zhang; Xiangjian Zhang; Sheng Wang
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 10.  Chemoreception and asphyxia-induced arousal.

Authors:  Patrice G Guyenet; Stephen B G Abbott
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 1.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.