BACKGROUND: The rapid and accurate diagnosis of influenza facilitates antiviral therapy, judicious antibiotic usage, and cohorting patients to decrease nosocomial infection. OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of rapid influenza tests in a children's hospital. STUDY DESIGN: Two in vitro rapid immunochromatographic assays that detect and distinguish influenza A and B viruses were compared to the reference standard of viral culture. RESULTS: In 9186 patients tested, overall sensitivity of the rapid assays for influenza A was 64.4% and specificity was 98.3%. Sensitivity and specificity were 28% and 99.9%, respectively, for influenza B. Overall sensitivity and specificity for Remel Xpect (2004/2005) were 47.7% and 98.7% for influenza A, and 20.3% and 99.8% for influenza B, respectively. Overall sensitivity and specificity of Binax NOW Flu A&B (2005/2006) were 78.3% and 98% for influenza A, and 35.9% and 99.9% for influenza B, respectively. The results for influenza B with both assays were significantly lower than previously reported and lower than stated in the manufacturer's package insert. CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary clinical setting, rapid assays for influenza displayed significantly lower sensitivities, especially for influenza B, than prior reports. Differences in pre- and post-licensure performance demonstrate the importance of continuous evaluation of rapid diagnostic tests for influenza.
BACKGROUND: The rapid and accurate diagnosis of influenza facilitates antiviral therapy, judicious antibiotic usage, and cohorting patients to decrease nosocomial infection. OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of rapid influenza tests in a children's hospital. STUDY DESIGN: Two in vitro rapid immunochromatographic assays that detect and distinguish influenza A and B viruses were compared to the reference standard of viral culture. RESULTS: In 9186 patients tested, overall sensitivity of the rapid assays for influenza A was 64.4% and specificity was 98.3%. Sensitivity and specificity were 28% and 99.9%, respectively, for influenza B. Overall sensitivity and specificity for Remel Xpect (2004/2005) were 47.7% and 98.7% for influenza A, and 20.3% and 99.8% for influenza B, respectively. Overall sensitivity and specificity of Binax NOW Flu A&B (2005/2006) were 78.3% and 98% for influenza A, and 35.9% and 99.9% for influenza B, respectively. The results for influenza B with both assays were significantly lower than previously reported and lower than stated in the manufacturer's package insert. CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary clinical setting, rapid assays for influenza displayed significantly lower sensitivities, especially for influenza B, than prior reports. Differences in pre- and post-licensure performance demonstrate the importance of continuous evaluation of rapid diagnostic tests for influenza.
Authors: S Heinonen; H Silvennoinen; P Lehtinen; R Vainionpää; T Heikkinen Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: H Rogier van Doorn; Nguyen van Kinh; Ha Manh Tuan; Tran Anh Tuan; Ngo Ngoc Quang Minh; Juliet E Bryant; Vu thi Ty Hang; Le thi Tham Uyen; Le Quoc Thinh; Tran thi Ngoc Anh; Nguyen Phu Huong Lan; Nguyen Vu Trung; Walter Taylor; Laura Merson; Heiman F L Wertheim; Jeremy Farrar; Marcel Wolbers; Nguyen van Vinh Chau; Menno D de Jong Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2012-02-22 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Scott A Harper; John S Bradley; Janet A Englund; Thomas M File; Stefan Gravenstein; Frederick G Hayden; Allison J McGeer; Kathleen M Neuzil; Andrew T Pavia; Michael L Tapper; Timothy M Uyeki; Richard K Zimmerman Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Marc Roger Couturier; Trenda Barney; Garrison Alger; Weston C Hymas; Jeffery B Stevenson; David Hillyard; Judy A Daly Journal: J Clin Lab Anal Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 2.352