Literature DB >> 18083593

Improvement in motor development following surgery for infantile esotropia.

James R Drover1, David R Stager, Sarah E Morale, Joel N Leffler, Eileen E Birch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Infantile esotropia is associated with abnormal visual development and thus may delay the achievement of developmental milestones. Although early surgery can improve visual function, less is known about its effect on motor development. Here we address whether early surgery can improve motor development.
METHODS: Recently, our lab devised the Infant Developmental Skills Survey, a 25-item questionnaire designed to assess sensorimotor and gross motor development. The questionnaire was completed by the parents of 3- to 10-month-old patients with infantile esotropia prior to surgery (n = 143) and the parents of 6- to 11-month-old patients following surgery (n = 58). A subset of parents (n = 40) completed the questionnaire both before and after surgery. For comparison, the questionnaire was completed by the parents of infants with normal ocular alignment (n = 194).
RESULTS: Before surgery 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, 9-, and 10-month-old patients showed delayed achievement of sensorimotor milestones (p < 0.01), and 5-, 9-, and 10-month-old patients demonstrated delayed attainment of gross motor milestones (p < 0.05) compared with normal children. However, following surgery, patients demonstrated a greater rate of sensorimotor development than age-matched controls (p < 0.0001) and caught up with normal children on both sensorimotor and gross motor skills.
CONCLUSIONS: Prior to surgery, patients with infantile esotropia were delayed in their achievement of developmental milestones. However, following surgery, a comparison group of patients showed rapid development and possessed motor skills comparable to those of normal children, suggesting that early surgery is beneficial to both visual and motor development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18083593      PMCID: PMC2476213          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  20 in total

Review 1.  Early surgical alignment for congenital esotropia.

Authors:  M R Ing
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1981

2.  Early surgery for infantile esotropia: results and influence of age upon results.

Authors:  T A Zak; J D Morin
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 1.882

3.  The Denver developmental screening test.

Authors:  W K Frankenburg; J B Dodds
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Developmental evaluation in congenital esotropia.

Authors:  M B Wheeler; K Stonesifer; M Kenny
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Strabismus surgery and its effect upon infant development in congenital esotropia.

Authors:  G L Rogers; S Chazan; R Fellows; B H Tsou
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Risk factors for the development of accommodative esotropia following treatment for infantile esotropia.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch; Sherry L Fawcett; David R Stager
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.220

7.  The Denver II: a major revision and restandardization of the Denver Developmental Screening Test.

Authors:  W K Frankenburg; J Dodds; P Archer; H Shapiro; B Bresnick
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Stereoacuity of human infants.

Authors:  R Held; E Birch; J Gwiazda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Random dot stereoacuity following surgical correction of infantile esotropia.

Authors:  E E Birch; D R Stager; M E Everett
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.402

10.  High-grade stereo acuity after early surgery for congenital esotropia.

Authors:  K W Wright; P M Edelman; J H McVey; A P Terry; M Lin
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-07
View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Stereo vision and strabismus.

Authors:  J C A Read
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Global motion perception is related to motor function in 4.5-year-old children born at risk of abnormal development.

Authors:  Arijit Chakraborty; Nicola S Anstice; Robert J Jacobs; Nabin Paudel; Linda L LaGasse; Barry M Lester; Christopher J D McKinlay; Jane E Harding; Trecia A Wouldes; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Eye muscle surgery for infantile nystagmus syndrome in the first two years of life.

Authors:  Richard W Hertle; Joost Felius; Dongsheng Yang; Matthew Kaufman
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-11-16

Review 4.  Stereoacuity outcomes after treatment of infantile and accommodative esotropia.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch; Jingyun Wang
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Association of Strabismus With Functional Vision and Eye-Related Quality of Life in Children.

Authors:  Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Yolanda S Castañeda; Suzanne M Wernimont; Laura Liebermann; Christina S Cheng-Patel; Eileen E Birch; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 7.389

Review 6.  Timing of surgery in essential infantile esotropia - What more do we know since the turn of the century?

Authors:  Manjushree Bhate; Maree Flaherty; Frank J Martin
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.969

7.  Strabismus surgery in Angelman syndrome: More than ocular alignment.

Authors:  Paola Michieletto; Stefano Pensiero; Laura Diplotti; Luca Ronfani; Manuela Giangreco; Alberto Danieli; Paolo Bonanni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Postural stability and visual impairment: Assessing balance in children with strabismus and amblyopia.

Authors:  Anat Bachar Zipori; Linda Colpa; Agnes M F Wong; Sharon L Cushing; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Stereopsis: are we assessing it in enough depth?

Authors:  Anna R O'Connor; Laurence P Tidbury
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 2.742

10.  LONG-TERM VARIABILITY OF STRABISMUS ANGLE IN NEUROLOGICALLY IMPAIRED PREMATURE INFANTS: A 12-YEAR FOLLOW UP.

Authors:  Ena Sardelić; Dobrila Karlica Utrobičić
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 0.780

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.