Literature DB >> 18083290

Location and features of instructive spatial cues do not influence the time course of covert shifts of visual spatial attention.

Matthias M Müller1.   

Abstract

The time course of shifting visual spatial attention to flickering stimuli in the left and right visual hemifield was investigated. The goal was to test whether an instructive peripheral salient cue located close to the newly to-be-attended location triggers faster shifts per se compared to a central cue. Besides behavioural data an objective electrophysiological measure, the steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) was used to measure the time course of visual pathway facilitation in the human brain for centrally and peripherally cued shifts of spatial attention. Results revealed that both spatial cues resulted in identical time courses of shifts of covert spatial attention. This was true with respect to behavioural data and SSVEP amplitude. Results support the notion that a salient peripheral spatial cue does not automatically produce faster shifts of spatial attention to the to-be-attended location when this cue is informative and embedded in an ongoing stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18083290     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  6 in total

1.  Behavioral performance follows the time course of neural facilitation and suppression during cued shifts of feature-selective attention.

Authors:  S K Andersen; M M Müller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Slow biasing of processing resources in early visual cortex is preceded by emotional cue extraction in emotion-attention competition.

Authors:  Liane I Schönwald; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Visual steady state in relation to age and cognitive function.

Authors:  Anna Horwitz; Mia Dyhr Thomsen; Iris Wiegand; Henrik Horwitz; Marc Klemp; Miki Nikolic; Lene Rask; Martin Lauritzen; Krisztina Benedek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The Time Course of Inhibition of Return: Evidence from Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Ai-Su Li; Gong-Liang Zhang; Cheng-Guo Miao; Shuang Wang; Ming Zhang; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-09-12

5.  The dynamics of attention during free looking.

Authors:  Sarah Enos Watamura; Katie A Devine; Steven S Robertson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Temporal dynamics of visual attention measured with event-related potentials.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Kashiwase; Kazumichi Matsumiya; Ichiro Kuriki; Satoshi Shioiri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.