Lily Clark1, Mark Lebwohl. 1. Department of Dermatology at Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity is rapidly increasing in the United States. Patients with psoriasis, in particular, tend to be above normal weight. Three of the 5 biologics used to treat psoriasis are fixed-dosed treatments: alefacept, etanercept, and adalimumab. Dosing regimens do not account for weight. OBJECTIVE: We attempted to determine whether the efficacy of the biologics is affected by weight. METHODS: We review the existing body of literature, including subgroup analyses, relating to efficacy and weight for infliximab, efalizumab, alefacept, and etanercept. No relevant literature was found for adalimumab. RESULTS: Weight-based dosed medications do not seem to lose efficacy with increasing weight. Both etanercept and alefacept may have compromised efficacy in heavier individuals. LIMITATIONS: The data are limited to subgroup analyses and smaller studies, often with no statistical significance reported. CONCLUSIONS: Additional studies are warranted, specifically designed to address the issue of obesity and response to therapy of the biologics. Alternative dosing for etanercept and alefacept should be further evaluated in patients above normal weight.
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity is rapidly increasing in the United States. Patients with psoriasis, in particular, tend to be above normal weight. Three of the 5 biologics used to treat psoriasis are fixed-dosed treatments: alefacept, etanercept, and adalimumab. Dosing regimens do not account for weight. OBJECTIVE: We attempted to determine whether the efficacy of the biologics is affected by weight. METHODS: We review the existing body of literature, including subgroup analyses, relating to efficacy and weight for infliximab, efalizumab, alefacept, and etanercept. No relevant literature was found for adalimumab. RESULTS: Weight-based dosed medications do not seem to lose efficacy with increasing weight. Both etanercept and alefacept may have compromised efficacy in heavier individuals. LIMITATIONS: The data are limited to subgroup analyses and smaller studies, often with no statistical significance reported. CONCLUSIONS: Additional studies are warranted, specifically designed to address the issue of obesity and response to therapy of the biologics. Alternative dosing for etanercept and alefacept should be further evaluated in patients above normal weight.
Authors: Robert A Lee; Erica Dommasch; James Treat; Joslyn Sciacca-Kirby; Samuel Chachkin; Jennifer Williams; Daniel B Shin; James J Leyden; Carmela Vittorio; Joel M Gelfand Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2009-01-31 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Junko Takeshita; Sungat Grewal; Sinéad M Langan; Nehal N Mehta; Alexis Ogdie; Abby S Van Voorhees; Joel M Gelfand Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Alexander A Navarini; Marco A Muster; Antonios G A Kolios; Philipp Fritsche; Martin Glatz; Lars E French; Ralph M Trüeb Journal: Case Rep Dermatol Date: 2011-06-18
Authors: Paola Di Meglio; Federica Villanova; Luca Napolitano; Isabella Tosi; Manuela Terranova Barberio; Rose K Mak; Sarah Nutland; Catherine H Smith; Jonathan N W N Barker; John A Todd; Frank O Nestle Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2013-04-05 Impact factor: 8.551