Literature DB >> 18082462

Uncorrected sagittal plane imbalance predisposes to symptomatic instrumentation failure.

Ronit Gilad1, Chirag D Gandhi, Marc S Arginteanu, Frank M Moore, Alfred Steinberger, Martin Camins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Elucidation of the factors responsible for symptomatic failure of spinal instrumentation has been a keen interest for many investigators.
PURPOSE: To quantitate the number of symptomatic instrumentation failures (SIFs) encountered during a 2-year period. The effect of sagittal plane imbalance (corrected or uncorrected) on the rate of SIF was evaluated. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of all patients requiring spinal instrumentation to determine which factors predispose toward instrumentation failure. PATIENT SAMPLE: All patients requiring spinal instrumentation over a 2-year period were retrospectively studied. OUTCOME MEASURES: Sagittal plane imbalance pre- and postoperatively was determined using Cobb angle analysis on plain X-rays. SIF was defined as screw back-out and/or breakage, pseudarthrosis, cage migration, or rod disconnection in patients with concordant symptoms. Asymptomatic patients did not demonstrate instrumentation failure on the routine postoperative X-rays.
METHODS: Of the 355 patients who fit the criteria, 47 patients presented with either idiopathic or secondary sagittal plane deformity preoperatively. Additionally, long-segment fixation, smoking, age, and fixation across junctional segments were evaluated as risk factors for SIF.
RESULTS: Of the 47 patients with sagittal plane deformity, 40 patients (85%) achieved correction demonstrated on postoperative radiographs whereas in 7 (15%), the sagittal plane imbalance was not corrected. Of these seven cases, five suffered instrumentation failure (failure rate 71.5%) versus no instrumentation failures (failure rate 0%) for the remaining 40 patients. SIF was demonstrated in 10 patients overall (failure rate of 2.8%). There was no correlation found between factors such as age, indications for surgery, or long-segment fixation, and instrumentation failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Failure to correct sagittal plane deformity intraoperatively predisposes patients to SIF regardless of age, level of surgery, or indication of surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18082462     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  4 in total

1.  Spinal surgery in patients with Parkinson's disease: experiences with the challenges posed by sagittal imbalance and the Parkinson's spine.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Frank Acosta; Juliane Zenner; Luis Ferraris; Wolfgang Hitzl; Oliver Meier; Steven Ondra; Tyler Koski; Rene Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Full-Body Radiographic Analysis of Postoperative Deviations From Age-Adjusted Alignment Goals in Adult Spinal Deformity Correction and Related Compensatory Recruitment.

Authors:  Peter G Passias; Cyrus M Jalai; Bassel G Diebo; Dana L Cruz; Gregory W Poorman; Aaron J Buckland; Louis M Day; Samantha R Horn; Barthélemy Liabaud; Renaud Lafage; Alexandra Soroceanu; Joseph F Baker; Shearwood McClelland; Jonathan H Oren; Thomas J Errico; Frank J Schwab; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-04-30

3.  Risk factors for rod fracture after posterior correction of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy: a retrospective case-series.

Authors:  Cameron Barton; Andriy Noshchenko; Vikas Patel; Christopher Cain; Christopher Kleck; Evalina Burger
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2015-11-04

4.  The Mechanical Effect of Rod Contouring on Rod-Screw System Strength in Spine Fixation.

Authors:  Nihat Acar; Ahmet Karakasli; Ahmet A Karaarslan; Mehmet Hilal Ozcanhan; Fatih Ertem; Mehmet Erduran
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-09-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.