Literature DB >> 18081360

Lack of bioequivalence between two aciclovir tablets in healthy subjects.

Hossein Amini1, Mohammad Javan, Parisa Gazerani, Alireza Ghaffari, Abolhassan Ahmadiani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the systemic bioavailability of two aciclovir tablets, Rouz-Aciclovir (test) and Zovirax (reference), in 12 healthy volunteers.
METHODS: In a crossover design, each subject received a single oral dose of aciclovir 400 mg followed by a 7-day washout period. Plasma concentrations of aciclovir were measured for up to 12 hours using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method with a lower limit of quantification of 50 microg/L.
RESULTS: The mean values of maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), time to C(max) (t(max)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 12 hours (AUC(12)) and from time 0 to infinity (AUC(infinity)), and plasma half-life following administration of the test product were 999.6 microg/L, 2.08 h, 4911.2 microg/L . h, 5417.7 microg/L . h and 3.08 h, respectively, and for the reference product 775.8 microg/L, 2.58 h, 3862.1 microg/L . h, 4295.4 microg/L . h and 3.14 h, respectively. The test/reference geometric ratio for C(max) (90% CI) was 1.30 (97.1, 174.8). The test/reference geometric ratios for AUC(12) (90% CI) and AUC(infinity) (90% CI) were 1.26 (99.7, 159.1) and 1.24 (98.9, 155.6), respectively. Therefore, the 90% CIs of C(max), AUC(12) and AUC(infinity) were not within the acceptable range of 80 and 125 suggested by the US FDA bioequivalence guideline.
CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest that the aciclovir test product was not bioequivalent to the reference product. The exact reasons for this remain to be determined. However, we think the difference should be attributed to the difference in the type and amounts of ingredients used in the formulation that probably affect the contact time of aciclovir with the sites of absorption in the gut.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18081360     DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200828010-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  17 in total

1.  Selectivity of action of an antiherpetic agent, 9-(2-hydroxyethoxymethyl) guanine.

Authors:  G B Elion; P A Furman; J A Fyfe; P de Miranda; L Beauchamp; H J Schaeffer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The effect of mannitol on the oral bioavailability of cimetidine.

Authors:  D A Adkin; S S Davis; R A Sparrow; P D Huckle; I R Wilding
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.534

3.  Design and development of microemulsion drug delivery system of acyclovir for improvement of oral bioavailability.

Authors:  Pradip Kumar Ghosh; Rita J Majithiya; Manish L Umrethia; Rayasa S R Murthy
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.246

4.  In vitro-in vivo relationships of several "immediate" release tablets containing a low permeability drug.

Authors:  J E Polli
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Bioequivalence assessment of Lovrak (Julphar, UAE) compared with Zovirax (Glaxo Wellcome, UK)--Two brands of Acyclovir--in healthy human volunteers.

Authors:  Naji M Najib; Nasir Idkaidek; Muntaser Beshtawi; B Mohammed; Isra' Admour; S Mahmood Alam; Ruwayda Dham
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.627

Review 6.  Antivirals for the treatment of herpesvirus infections.

Authors:  E De Clercq
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Mechanism of acyclovir uptake in rat jejunum.

Authors:  K C Meadows; J B Dressman
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 8.  Evaluation of oral acyclovir therapy.

Authors:  C Fletcher; B Bean
Journal:  Drug Intell Clin Pharm       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug

Review 9.  Aciclovir. A reappraisal of its antiviral activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  A J Wagstaff; D Faulds; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Efficacy of valacyclovir vs acyclovir for the prevention of recurrent herpes simplex virus eye disease: a pilot study.

Authors:  Elisabetta Miserocchi; Giulio Modorati; Laura Galli; Paolo Rama
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  5 in total

1.  Acyclovir achieves a lower concentration in African HIV-seronegative, herpes simplex virus 2-seropositive women than in non-African populations.

Authors:  Yanhui Lu; Connie Celum; Anna Wald; Jared M Baeten; Frances Cowan; Sinead Delany-Moretlwe; Stewart E Reid; James P Hughes; Ellen Wilcox; Lawrence Corey; Craig W Hendrix
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  A missed point in deciphering the viral synergy between herpes simplex virus and HIV.

Authors:  Andrea Lisco; Christophe Vanpouille; Leonid Margolis
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  Varicella zoster virus (VZV) in solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  S A Pergam; A P Limaye
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Varicella zoster virus in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  S A Pergam; A P Limaye
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Prediction of Maternal and Fetal Acyclovir, Emtricitabine, Lamivudine, and Metformin Concentrations during Pregnancy Using a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling Approach.

Authors:  Khaled Abduljalil; Amita Pansari; Jia Ning; Masoud Jamei
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 6.447

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.