Literature DB >> 18081181

The enduring effects of an adolescent social stressor on synaptic density, part II: Poststress reversal of synaptic loss in the cortex by adinazolam and MK-801.

Melanie P Leussis1, Katherine Lawson, Kimberly Stone, Susan L Andersen.   

Abstract

Experience programs synaptic development to match the needs of the environment. This process depends on the nature and timing of the experience. Exposure to stress during adolescence selectively reduces synaptic density in the prefrontal cortex (a later maturing region), while sparing hippocampal synapses (an earlier maturing region). To determine whether the anatomical effects of an adolescent social stressor in rats endures into adulthood and are reversible, male subjects were isolation or group housed between days 30 and 35 and then treated with vehicle, adinazolam, MK-801, or tianeptine between days 40 and 55. At day 60, immunohistochemistry revealed a 13.5% +/- 5.3% reduction in synaptophysin in the infralimbic cortex and cingulate gyrus in isolation-housed subjects. MK-801 and adinazolam restored cortical synaptic density to within 2% of group-housed values, suggesting that the synaptic loss induced by stress during adolescence is modulated through reduced glutamatergic activity directly by NMDA antagonism or indirectly by enhancing GABAergic activity. Tianeptine did not modulate adolescent stress effects in the prefrontal cortex. None of these drugs increased cortical synaptophysin in group-housed controls. Increased synaptophysin was observed in the group-housed condition in the hippocampus, striatum, and nucleus accumbens following drug exposure. Although stress did not decrease synaptic density in these regions, drug exposure failed to increase synaptic density when compared with the controls. Taken together, stress-induced changes in cortical, but not hippocampal, synaptic density initiated during adolescence endure into adulthood. These cortical changes can be reversed through a reduction of glutamatergic activity, but not serotonin augmentation. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18081181     DOI: 10.1002/syn.20483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Synapse        ISSN: 0887-4476            Impact factor:   2.562


  35 in total

1.  Prefrontal cortical inputs to the basal amygdala undergo pruning during late adolescence in the rat.

Authors:  Victoria L Cressman; Jordan Balaban; Sara Steinfeld; Alexei Shemyakin; Peter Graham; Nelly Parisot; Holly Moore
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 2.  Have studies of the developmental regulation of behavioral phenotypes revealed the mechanisms of gene-environment interactions?

Authors:  F Scott Hall; Maria T G Perona
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-05-27

3.  Glucocorticoid receptor expression in the stress-limbic circuitry is differentially affected by prenatal alcohol exposure and adolescent stress.

Authors:  Charlis Raineki; Erin J Morgan; Linda Ellis; Joanne Weinberg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Social Isolation in Male Rats During Adolescence Inhibits the Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway in the Prefrontal Cortex and Enhances Anxiety and Cocaine-Induced Plasticity in Adulthood.

Authors:  Santiago Cuesta; Alejandrina Funes; Alejandra M Pacchioni
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 5.203

5.  α4βδ-GABAA receptors in dorsal hippocampal CA1 of adolescent female rats traffic to the plasma membrane of dendritic spines following voluntary exercise and contribute to protection of animals from activity-based anorexia through localization at excitatory synapses.

Authors:  Chiye Aoki; Yi-Wen Chen; Tara Gunkali Chowdhury; Walter Piper
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Prelimbic medial prefrontal cortex disruption during adolescence increases susceptibility to helpless behavior in adult rats.

Authors:  Daniela L Uliana; Felipe V Gomes; Anthony A Grace
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.600

7.  Adolescent social defeat alters markers of adult dopaminergic function.

Authors:  Andrew M Novick; Gina L Forster; Shanaz M Tejani-Butt; Michael J Watt
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 8.  Reducing substance use during adolescence: a translational framework for prevention.

Authors:  Jessica J Stanis; Susan L Andersen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Structure of distress call: implication for specificity and activation of dopaminergic system.

Authors:  Subramanian Mariappan; Wieslaw Bogdanowicz; Hanumanthan Raghuram; Ganapathy Marimuthu; Koilmani Emmanuvel Rajan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Adolescent environmental enrichment prevents behavioral and physiological sequelae of adolescent chronic stress in female (but not male) rats.

Authors:  Brittany L Smith; Rachel L Morano; Yvonne M Ulrich-Lai; Brent Myers; Matia B Solomon; James P Herman
Journal:  Stress       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.