BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that younger age is associated with a greater likelihood of positive sentinel node (SN) status in patients with localized melanoma. This is a paradoxical situation because it is well known that younger patients have a far more favorable overall survival rate than older patients. In addition, desmoplastic melanomas are associated with a lower frequency of SN positivity, although this is less well documented. METHODS: The outcome for 2303 cutaneous melanoma patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) at the Sydney Melanoma Unit between 1993 and 2006 was examined to clarify the role of patient age and desmoplastic histogenetic type on SN positivity. RESULTS: By univariate analysis, patients aged <40 years had a higher SN positivity rate (22.6%) than patients aged > or =40 years (15.4%; P < .004). Features associated with SN positivity were tumor thickness, mitotic rate, ulcerative state, and nondesmoplastic histogenetic type (all P < .001). Patient sex and primary melanoma site were not statistically significantly associated. Multivariate analyses revealed that only tumor thickness, patient age, nondesmoplastic type (all P < .001), and ulceration (P < .026) were independently associated with SN positivity. Key prognostic determinants such as total number of disease-positive nodes (both SNs and non-SNs) and site of first relapse did not vary according to age. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor thickness, patient age, desmoplastic histogenetic type, and primary melanoma ulceration were all independently associated with SN status. The factors underlying the paradox of a poorer survival rate in older patients despite a lower incidence of positive SNs remain unclear.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that younger age is associated with a greater likelihood of positive sentinel node (SN) status in patients with localized melanoma. This is a paradoxical situation because it is well known that younger patients have a far more favorable overall survival rate than older patients. In addition, desmoplastic melanomas are associated with a lower frequency of SN positivity, although this is less well documented. METHODS: The outcome for 2303 cutaneous melanomapatients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) at the Sydney Melanoma Unit between 1993 and 2006 was examined to clarify the role of patient age and desmoplastic histogenetic type on SN positivity. RESULTS: By univariate analysis, patients aged <40 years had a higher SN positivity rate (22.6%) than patients aged > or =40 years (15.4%; P < .004). Features associated with SN positivity were tumor thickness, mitotic rate, ulcerative state, and nondesmoplastic histogenetic type (all P < .001). Patient sex and primary melanoma site were not statistically significantly associated. Multivariate analyses revealed that only tumor thickness, patient age, nondesmoplastic type (all P < .001), and ulceration (P < .026) were independently associated with SN positivity. Key prognostic determinants such as total number of disease-positive nodes (both SNs and non-SNs) and site of first relapse did not vary according to age. CONCLUSIONS:Tumor thickness, patient age, desmoplastic histogenetic type, and primary melanoma ulceration were all independently associated with SN status. The factors underlying the paradox of a poorer survival rate in older patients despite a lower incidence of positive SNs remain unclear.
Authors: Richard L White; Gregory D Ayers; Virginia H Stell; Shouluan Ding; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Jonathan C Salo; Barbara A Pockaj; Richard Essner; Mark Faries; Kim James Charney; Eli Avisar; Axel Hauschild; Friederike Egberts; Bruce J Averbook; Carlos A Garberoglio; John T Vetto; Merrick I Ross; David Chu; Vijay Trisal; Harald Hoekstra; Eric Whitman; Harold J Wanebo; Daniel Debonis; Michael Vezeridis; Aaron Chevinsky; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; Yu Shyr; Lynne Berry; Zhiguo Zhao; Seng-Jaw Soong; Stanley P L Leong Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-06-07 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Charles M Balch; Seng-jaw Soong; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; John F Thompson; Daniel G Coit; Michael B Atkins; Shouluan Ding; Alistair J Cochran; Alexander M M Eggermont; Keith T Flaherty; Phyllis A Gimotty; Timothy M Johnson; John M Kirkwood; Stanley P Leong; Kelly M McMasters; Martin C Mihm; Donald L Morton; Merrick I Ross; Vernon K Sondak Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-07-10 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: K T Huynh; Y Takei; C Kuo; R A Scolyer; R Murali; K Chong; L Takeshima; M-S Sim; D L Morton; R R Turner; J F Thompson; D S B Hoon Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 2012-05-18 Impact factor: 9.302
Authors: Michael S Sabel; John D Rice; Kent A Griffith; Lori Lowe; Sandra L Wong; Alfred E Chang; Timothy M Johnson; Jeremy M G Taylor Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-08-06 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: James M Chang; Heidi E Kosiorek; Amylou C Dueck; Stanley P L Leong; John T Vetto; Richard L White; Eli Avisar; Vernon K Sondak; Jane L Messina; Jonathan S Zager; Carlos Garberoglio; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; Barbara A Pockaj Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Alexander Meves; Ekaterina Nikolova; Joel B Heim; Edwin J Squirewell; Mark A Cappel; Mark R Pittelkow; Clark C Otley; Nille Behrendt; Ditte M Saunte; Jorgen Lock-Andersen; Louis A Schenck; Amy L Weaver; Vera J Suman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-07-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lucy L Chen; Natalia Jaimes; Christopher A Barker; Klaus J Busam; Ashfaq A Marghoob Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2012-12-23 Impact factor: 11.527