Literature DB >> 18080714

Use of intracolonic bypass secured by a biodegradable anastomotic ring to protect the low rectal anastomosis.

Feng Ye1, Danyang Wang, Xiangming Xu, Fanlong Liu, Jianjiang Lin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Because of the relatively high morbidity and mortality of anastomotic leakage in patients with low rectal cancer who receive an anterior resection, many fecal diverting methods have been introduced. This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of the Valtrac-secured intracolonic bypass in protecting low rectal anastomosis and to compare the efficacy and complications of Valtrac-secured intracolonic bypass with those of loop ileostomy.
METHODS: From January 2002 to April 2006, 83 patients with rectal cancer who underwent elective low anterior resection received intracolonic bypass or ileostomy. Demographics, clinical features, and operative data were recorded.
RESULTS: Forty-four patients (53 percent) received a Valtrac-secured intracolonic bypass and 39 patients (47 percent) a loop ileostomy. The demographics and clinical features of the groups were similar. None of the patients developed clinical anastomotic leakage. Longer overall postoperative hospital stay (21.3 +/- 5.8 days) and higher costs incurred (3.1 +/- 0.9 x $1,000 U.S. dollars) were observed in the ileostomy group than in the intracolonic bypass group (12.5 +/- 6.3 days, 4.4 +/- 1.2 x $1,000 U.S. dollars; P < 0.05). Stoma-related complications in the ileostomy group included dermatitis (12.8 percent), bleeding (2.6 percent), and intestinal obstruction after stoma closure (5.1 percent). No complications were observed in the intracolonic bypass group except for the Valtrac ring discharging en bloc, which compromised fecal evacuation in two cases (4.5 percent).
CONCLUSIONS: The Valtrac-secured intracolonic bypass procedure is a safe, effective, but time-limited, diverting technique to protect an elective low colorectal anastomosis. Valtrac-secured intracolonic bypass, in contrast to loop ileostomy, avoids stoma-related complications or readmission for closure and is associated with decreased hospital time and cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18080714     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-9144-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  11 in total

1.  Sutureless primary repair of colonic perforation with a degradable stent in a porcine model of fecal peritonitis.

Authors:  Kun Liu; Hong Yu; Minghui Zhang; Yichen Yu; Yifan Wang; Xiujun Cai
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Emerging Trends in the Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leakage.

Authors:  Sami A Chadi; Abe Fingerhut; Mariana Berho; Steven R DeMeester; James W Fleshman; Neil H Hyman; David A Margolin; Joseph E Martz; Elisabeth C McLemore; Daniela Molena; Martin I Newman; Janice F Rafferty; Bashar Safar; Anthony J Senagore; Oded Zmora; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Hand suture versus stapler for closure of loop ileostomy--a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Thorsten Löffler; Inga Rossion; Käthe Gooßen; Daniel Saure; Jürgen Weitz; Alexis Ulrich; Markus W Büchler; Markus K Diener
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Can intraluminal devices prevent or reduce colorectal anastomotic leakage: a review.

Authors:  Annelien N Morks; Klaas Havenga; Rutger J Ploeg
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  The C-seal: a biofragmentable drain protecting the stapled colorectal anastomosis from leakage.

Authors:  Annelien N Morks; Klaas Havenga; Henk O Ten Cate Hoedemaker; Rutger J Ploeg
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Malone Antegrade Continence Enema in Patients with Perineal Colostomy After Rectal Resection.

Authors:  Jin-Hai Wang; Jia-He Xu; Feng Ye; Xiang-Ming Xu; Jian-Jiang Lin; Wen-Bin Chen
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 0.656

7.  Long-term fecal diverting device for the prevention of sepsis in case of colorectal anastomotic leakage: an animal experiment.

Authors:  Jae Hwang Kim; Sang Hun Jung; Yong-Jin Kim; Se-Ll Park; Dae-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Use of Valtrac™-secured intracolonic bypass in laparoscopic rectal cancer resection.

Authors:  Feng Ye; Dong Chen; Danyang Wang; Jianjiang Lin; Shusen Zheng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Protection of low rectal anastomosis with a new tube ileostomy using a biofragmentable anastomosis ring: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Liming Liu; Qi Huang; Jialiang Wang; Quanning Chen; Rui Lin; Bujun Ge
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Application of spontaneously closing cannula ileostomy in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Dong Chen; Huiying Zhao; Qiang Huang; Xiangming Xu; Xiaofei Cheng; Bingxin Ke; Danyang Wang; Hanju Hua; Jiahe Xu; Jianjiang Lin; Feng Ye
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.