BACKGROUND: Because definitive methods for diagnosing primary syphilis are limited, it is important to optimize the sensitivity of serodiagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the most sensitive testing approach to the diagnosis of primary syphilis, using the commonly available serologic tests: the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test and the Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TP-PA) test. METHODS: Sensitivities of 2 serologic testing strategies for primary syphilis were compared among 106 darkfield-confirmed cases treated in San Francisco from January 2002 through December 2004. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the diagnostic strategy using VDRL confirmed by TP-PA was 71% (95% CI, 61%-79%). Substituting Rapid Plasma Reagin test for VDRL in a subset of 51 patients produced the same sensitivity (71%; 95% CI, 56%-83%). The sensitivity of TP-PA as the first-line diagnostic test was 86% (95% CI, 78%-92%). The sensitivity of the former approach was significantly lower among HIV-positive patients, compared with HIV-negative patients (55% vs. 77%, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The TP-PA test as the first-line diagnostic test yielded higher sensitivity for primary syphilis than did the use of the currently recommended strategy.
BACKGROUND: Because definitive methods for diagnosing primary syphilis are limited, it is important to optimize the sensitivity of serodiagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the most sensitive testing approach to the diagnosis of primary syphilis, using the commonly available serologic tests: the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test and the Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TP-PA) test. METHODS: Sensitivities of 2 serologic testing strategies for primary syphilis were compared among 106 darkfield-confirmed cases treated in San Francisco from January 2002 through December 2004. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the diagnostic strategy using VDRL confirmed by TP-PA was 71% (95% CI, 61%-79%). Substituting Rapid Plasma Reagin test for VDRL in a subset of 51 patients produced the same sensitivity (71%; 95% CI, 56%-83%). The sensitivity of TP-PA as the first-line diagnostic test was 86% (95% CI, 78%-92%). The sensitivity of the former approach was significantly lower among HIV-positivepatients, compared with HIV-negative patients (55% vs. 77%, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The TP-PA test as the first-line diagnostic test yielded higher sensitivity for primary syphilis than did the use of the currently recommended strategy.
Authors: Anuradha Ganesan; Ann Fieberg; Brian K Agan; Tahaniyat Lalani; Michael L Landrum; Glenn Wortmann; Nancy F Crum-Cianflone; Alan R Lifson; Grace Macalino Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: P A Grange; L Gressier; P L Dion; D Farhi; N Benhaddou; P Gerhardt; J P Morini; J Deleuze; C Pantoja; A Bianchi; F Lassau; M F Avril; M Janier; N Dupin Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Ina U Park; Yetunde F Fakile; Joan M Chow; Kathleen J Gustafson; Heather Jost; Jeffrey M Schapiro; Susan Novak-Weekley; Anthony Tran; Jim H Nomura; Victor Chen; Manie Beheshti; Townson Tsai; Karen Hoover; Gail Bolan Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Rosanna W Peeling; David Mabey; Mary L Kamb; Xiang-Sheng Chen; Justin D Radolf; Adele S Benzaken Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2017-10-12 Impact factor: 52.329