Literature DB >> 18079506

Assessing attitudes about genetic testing as a component of continuing medical education.

Michael Mrazek1, Barbara Koenig, Michelle Skime, Karen Snyder, Christopher Hook, John Black, David Mrazek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the attitudes among mental health professionals regarding the use of genetic testing.
METHODS: Psychiatrists and other mental health professionals (N=41) who were enrolled in a week-long course in psychiatric genomics completed questionnaires before and after the course designed to assess how diagnostic genetic tests should be used and the value of pharmacogenomic testing for clinical practice.
RESULTS: Only 5% of the course participants knew their genotype for the CYP 2D6 and CYP 2C19 genes at the time they participated in the course. However, after completing the course, 95% of the participants who had not been tested responded that they would be tested if genotyping was provided at no cost. Most of the participants reported that adults have the right to know their genotypes. Specifically, a majority of participants also reported that adults should have access to information regarding their genetic predispositions to both Huntington's disease and Alzheimer's disease. A majority of participants believed that parents had the right to know the genotypes of their children and that adolescents should have access to their genotypes if they had parental permission or were emancipated minors. However, only 29% of participants reported that children ages 6 to 12 should have access to the results of their genotyping.
CONCLUSION: Continuing medical educational programs can provide an effective and informative opportunity to develop a better understanding of contemporary perspectives of practicing clinicians. Despite some variability in beliefs regarding the implications of age and diagnosis for making genetic testing decisions, a majority of course participants reported that they would choose to be genotyped for two drug metabolizing enzyme genes. Furthermore, they felt that, in most circumstances, adults should be permitted to know their genotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18079506     DOI: 10.1176/appi.ap.31.6.447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Psychiatry        ISSN: 1042-9670


  6 in total

Review 1.  Genetic testing in psychiatry: a review of attitudes and beliefs.

Authors:  Ryan E Lawrence; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Psychiatry       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.458

2.  Pharmacogenomics Education Improves Pharmacy Student Perceptions of Their Abilities and Roles in Its Use.

Authors:  Rebecca Marcinak; Meaghan Paris; Shannon R M Kinney
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Genomic risk profiling: attitudes and use in personal and clinical care of primary care physicians who offer risk profiling.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Madeline M Carrig; Julianne M O'Daniel; Lori A Orlando; Ley A Killeya-Jones; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Alex Cho
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Integrating Genomics into Psychiatric Practice: Ethical and Legal Challenges for Clinicians.

Authors:  Eric T Ward; Kristin M Kostick; Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 5.  Genetics/genomics education for nongenetic health professionals: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Divya Talwar; Tung-Sung Tseng; Margaret Foster; Lei Xu; Lei-Shih Chen
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Adolescent perceptions of pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  Stephani L Stancil; Courtney Berrios; Susan Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.533

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.