Literature DB >> 18079188

CSF leaks: correlation of high-resolution CT and multiplanar reformations with intraoperative endoscopic findings.

V La Fata1, N McLean, S K Wise, J M DelGaudio, P A Hudgins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Skull base defects can result in CSF leaks, with meningitis as a potential complication. Surgeons are now routinely repairing these leaks via a nasal endoscopic approach. Accurate preoperative imaging is essential for surgical planning. A variety of imaging regimens have been employed, including axial and direct coronal CT, CT cisternography with iodinated contrast, radionuclide cisternography, and MR imaging. Now that multidetector helical CT is available, the purpose of this study was to determine how well coronal and sagittal multiplanar reformatted (MPR) images generated from a high-resolution axial dataset correlate with intraoperative findings in a group of patients with clinically proved CSF leaks.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed imaging findings and surgical records of 19 patients who presented to our tertiary care institution during a 2.5-year period with clinically proved CSF leak. Patients underwent preoperative imaging with high-resolution helical CT (section collimation, 10 patients with 0.625-mm and 9 patients with 1.25-mm images), with MPR images processed by a neuroradiologist at a workstation. Two neuroradiologists, blinded to the intraoperative findings, determined the location and size of the skull base defects. All patients underwent endoscopic evaluation by an experienced sinonasal otolaryngologist, who confirmed the site of the CSF leak by direct inspection and measured the corresponding osseous defect. CT was considered accurate if it correctly localized the CSF leak and was within 2 mm of the endoscopic measurement.
RESULTS: At endoscopy, 22 leaks of CSF were identified in 18 of 19 patients. CT correctly predicted the site of the leak in 20 (91%) of 22 cases and was accurate (within 2 mm of the endoscopic measurement) in 15 (75%) of 20 cases preoperatively localized. The CT measurement of the skull base defect differed from the endoscopic size in 5 (25%) of 20 cases, ranging from 7.4 mm below to 13 mm above the intraoperative measurement. When analysis was limited to the subgroup of 10 patients who had 0.625-mm axial images, the accuracy was improved, and of the 11 CSF leaks described at CT, all were verified at endoscopy. In addition, the submillimeter CT accurately measured the size of the osseous defect in 9 (82%) of 11 cases. In the remaining 2 (18%) of 11 cases, CT minimally overestimated the size of the osseous defect by only 3 mm.
CONCLUSION: Axial images, and coronal, sagittal, and oblique MPR images generated from high-resolution axial CT performed well preoperatively, localizing the skull base defect responsible for the CSF leak. However, active manipulation of the axial dataset at a workstation is crucial in identifying and correctly describing these lesions. When submillimeter collimation is available, measurement of the osseous defects are accurate most of the time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18079188      PMCID: PMC8118881          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  14 in total

Review 1.  General principles of MDCT.

Authors:  Mathias Prokop
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  The efficacy of computer assisted surgery in the endoscopic management of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea.

Authors:  Abtin Tabaee; Tali L Kassenoff; Ashutosh Kacker; Vijay K Anand
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Evaluation of high-resolution CT and MR cisternography in the diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid fistula.

Authors:  P G Shetty; M M Shroff; D V Sahani; M V Kirtane
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Post-traumatic cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea: modern high-definition computed tomography is all that is required for the effective demonstration of the site of leakage.

Authors:  M N Lloyd; P M Kimber; E H Burrows
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  Sinonasal cerebrospinal fluid leaks: management of 97 patients over 10 years.

Authors:  S Mirza; A Thaper; L McClelland; N S Jones
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Endoscopic CSF rhinorrhea closure: our experience in 267 cases.

Authors:  Milind V Kirtane; K Gautham; Shraddha R Upadhyaya
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Endoscopic management of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea.

Authors:  Kevin C McMains; Charles W Gross; Stilianos E Kountakis
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Transnasal endoscopic repair of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea and skull base defect: ten-year experience.

Authors:  Ta-Jen Lee; Chi-Che Huang; Chi-Cheng Chuang; Shiang-Fu Huang
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Evaluation of CSF leaks: high-resolution CT compared with contrast-enhanced CT and radionuclide cisternography.

Authors:  J A Stone; M Castillo; B Neelon; S K Mukherji
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  Nasal cerebrospinal fluid leaks: critical review and surgical considerations.

Authors:  Rodney J Schlosser; William E Bolger
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  18 in total

1.  Imaging of cerebrospinal fluid leaks.

Authors:  Erich Hofmann; Robert Behr; Konrad Schwager
Journal:  Klin Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-05-23

2.  The contribution of 3D-CISS and contrast-enhanced MR cisternography in detecting cerebrospinal fluid leak in patients with rhinorrhoea.

Authors:  O Algin; B Hakyemez; G Gokalp; T Ozcan; E Korfali; M Parlak
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Spontaneous nasal cerebrospinal fluid leaks: management of 24 patients over 11 years.

Authors:  Anna S Englhard; Veronika Volgger; Andreas Leunig; Catalina S Meßmer; Georg J Ledderose
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Danger points, complications and medico-legal aspects in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  W Hosemann; C Draf
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

5.  Value of systematic analysis of the olfactory cleft in case of cerebrospinal rhinorrhea: incidence of olfactory arachnoid dilatation.

Authors:  Imen Gharzouli; Benjamin Verillaud; Hugo Tran; Jean-Philippe Blancal; Elisabeth Sauvaget; Romain Kania; Jean-Pierre Guichard; Philippe Herman
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Is topical fluorescein that effective in endoscopic CSF leak closure?

Authors:  Erdem Eren; Gönül Güvenç; Akif İşlek; Seçil Arslanoğlu; Kazım Önal; Nurullah Yüceer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Spontaneous lateral sphenoid cephaloceles: anatomic factors contributing to pathogenesis and proposed classification.

Authors:  F Settecase; H R Harnsberger; M A Michel; P Chapman; C M Glastonbury
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Contemporary Trends in the Management of Posttraumatic Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks.

Authors:  Moustafa Mourad; Jared C Inman; David M Chan; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2016-11-01

9.  Comparison of CT and MRI in diagnosis of cerebrospinal leak induced by multiple fractures of skull base.

Authors:  Xuhui Wang; Minhui Xu; Hong Liang; Lunshan Xu
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Pseudo-Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks of the Anterior Skull Base: Algorithm for Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Felipe Constanzo; Jaime Pinto; Sahba Sedaghat; Thomas Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-11-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.