Literature DB >> 18078528

Inconsistency of performance on neglect subtype tests following acute right hemisphere stroke.

R H Hamilton1, H B Coslett, L J Buxbaum, J Whyte, M K Ferraro.   

Abstract

Hemispatial neglect has been conceptualized as having dissociable and potentially clinically relevant subtypes. However, the question of whether patient performance on neglect subtype measures is consistent over time remains largely unanswered. We examined changes in performance over time on measures of motor, perceptual, and personal neglect in 21 patients with neglect from acute right hemisphere stroke. Patients were assessed on three occasions, separated by at least one week, using a lateralized target test, lateralized response test, and modified fluff test. Across three testing timepoints, 18 (85.7%) patients changed subtype performance patterns at least once. In 13 (61.9%) of these patients, inconsistency between timepoints was not adequately accounted for by recovery. On initial testing, seven, patients (33.3%) demonstrated more than one neglect subtype symptom; by the third testing timepoint none of the patients demonstrated multiple symptoms. In the setting of acute stroke, performance on three measures of neglect symptoms is inconsistent across time. However, the distribution of neglect subtype symptoms appears to become more discrete over time. These findings complicate our understanding of the pathophysiology and potential prognostic value of neglect subtypes, and suggest that treatment decisions based on subtype performance assessed at a single timepoint, may be of limited utility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18078528     DOI: 10.1017/S1355617708080077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc        ISSN: 1355-6177            Impact factor:   2.892


  9 in total

Review 1.  Spatial neglect and attention networks.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Patching for Diplopia Contraindicated in Patients with Brain Injury?

Authors:  Kevin E Houston; A M Barrett
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Increased effect of target eccentricity on covert shifts of visual attention in patients with neglect.

Authors:  Roy H Hamilton; Marianna Stark; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Disentangling input and output-related components of spatial neglect.

Authors:  Tobias Loetscher; Michael E R Nicholls; Amy Brodtmann; Nicole A Thomas; Peter Brugger
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 5.  Spatial neglect.

Authors:  Korina Li; Paresh A Malhotra
Journal:  Pract Neurol       Date:  2015-05-28

Review 6.  In (or outside of) your neck of the woods: laterality in spatial body representation.

Authors:  Sylvia Hach; Simone Schütz-Bosbach
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-19

7.  Visuospatial Neglect - a Theory-Informed Overview of Current and Emerging Strategies and a Systematic Review on the Therapeutic Use of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Paul Theo Zebhauser; Marine Vernet; Evelyn Unterburger; Anna-Katharine Brem
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 7.444

8.  Spatial Neglect Subtypes, Definitions and Assessment Tools: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Lindy J Williams; Jocelyn Kernot; Susan L Hillier; Tobias Loetscher
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Advancing the science of spatial neglect rehabilitation: an improved statistical approach with mixed linear modeling.

Authors:  Kelly M Goedert; Raymond C Boston; A M Barrett
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.