OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of job characteristics and intelligence to cognitive status in members of the National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council Twins Registry of World War II veterans. METHODS: Participants (n = 1,036) included individuals with an assessment of intelligence based on Armed Services testing in early adulthood. In late adulthood, these individuals completed the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-m) and occupational history as part of an epidemiologic study of aging and dementia. Occupational history was coded to produce a matrix of job characteristics. Based on factor analysis, job characteristics were interpreted as reflecting general intellectual demands (GI), human interaction and communication (HC), physical activity (PA), and visual attention (VA). RESULTS: Based on regression analysis of TICS-m score covarying for age, intelligence, and years of education, higher levels of GI and HC were independently associated with higher TICS-m performance, whereas higher PA was independently associated with lower performance. There was an interaction of GI and intelligence, indicating that individuals at the lower range of intellectual aptitude in early adulthood derived greater cognitive benefit from intellectually demanding work. CONCLUSIONS: Intellectually demanding work was associated with greater benefit to cognitive performance in later life independent of related factors like education and intelligence. The fact that individuals with lower intellectual aptitude demonstrated a stronger positive association between work and higher cognitive performance during retirement suggests that behavior may enhance intellectual reserve, perhaps even years after peak intellectual activity.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of job characteristics and intelligence to cognitive status in members of the National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council Twins Registry of World War II veterans. METHODS:Participants (n = 1,036) included individuals with an assessment of intelligence based on Armed Services testing in early adulthood. In late adulthood, these individuals completed the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-m) and occupational history as part of an epidemiologic study of aging and dementia. Occupational history was coded to produce a matrix of job characteristics. Based on factor analysis, job characteristics were interpreted as reflecting general intellectual demands (GI), human interaction and communication (HC), physical activity (PA), and visual attention (VA). RESULTS: Based on regression analysis of TICS-m score covarying for age, intelligence, and years of education, higher levels of GI and HC were independently associated with higher TICS-m performance, whereas higher PA was independently associated with lower performance. There was an interaction of GI and intelligence, indicating that individuals at the lower range of intellectual aptitude in early adulthood derived greater cognitive benefit from intellectually demanding work. CONCLUSIONS: Intellectually demanding work was associated with greater benefit to cognitive performance in later life independent of related factors like education and intelligence. The fact that individuals with lower intellectual aptitude demonstrated a stronger positive association between work and higher cognitive performance during retirement suggests that behavior may enhance intellectual reserve, perhaps even years after peak intellectual activity.
Authors: Ross Andel; Michael Crowe; Nancy L Pedersen; James Mortimer; Eileen Crimmins; Boo Johansson; Margaret Gatz Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Gavin Turrell; John W Lynch; George A Kaplan; Susan A Everson; Eeva-Liisa Helkala; Jussi Kauhanen; Jukka T Salonen Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: A F Jorm; B Rodgers; A S Henderson; A E Korten; P A Jacomb; H Christensen; A Mackinnon Journal: Age Ageing Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Kevin Duff; David Shprecher; Irene Litvan; Adam Gerstenecker; Benjamin Mast Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Gwenith G Fisher; Alicia Stachowski; Frank J Infurna; Jessica D Faul; James Grosch; Lois E Tetrick Journal: J Occup Health Psychol Date: 2014-03-17
Authors: Bruce R Reed; Dan Mungas; Sarah Tomaszewski Farias; Danielle Harvey; Laurel Beckett; Keith Widaman; Ladson Hinton; Charles DeCarli Journal: Brain Date: 2010-06-30 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Claudia B Padula; Julie C Weitlauf; Allyson C Rosen; Gayle Reiber; Barbara B Cochrane; Michelle J Naughton; Wenjun Li; Michelle Rissling; Kristine Yaffe; Julie R Hunt; Marcia L Stefanick; Mary K Goldstein; Mark A Espeland Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2015-11-27
Authors: Kenneth M Langa; David J Llewellyn; Iain A Lang; David R Weir; Robert B Wallace; Mohammed U Kabeto; Felicia A Huppert Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2009-06-25 Impact factor: 3.921