Literature DB >> 18077751

[The implications of the hospitalist phenomenon].

François Lehmann1, Yvon Brunelle, Martin Dawes, Richard Boulé, Rénald Bergeron.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of 2 different systems of hospital care by means of a literature review. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: Many areas remain unclear because several of the studies are opportunistic and report only isolated experiences or simple before-after observations. Few studies are really experimental, and all were conducted in academic settings, which limits their validity outside these settings. MAIN MESSAGE: The evidence supports the use of hospitalists who devote a minimum of 2 months each year to hospital work and practice full-time on the wards. More often than not, costs are reduced and better education for residents is provided with the hospitalist system. An important point regarding quality of care is that mortality rates are similar with both systems.
CONCLUSION: Some questions remain unanswered. For example, what is the best type of training for preparing residents for hospital work and what is the best way for physicians to maintain their skills in this area?

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18077751      PMCID: PMC2231552     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  38 in total

1.  Evaluation of a pediatric hospitalist service: impact on length of stay and hospital charges.

Authors:  P S Bellet; R C Whitaker
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Hospitalist model: advantages and concerns.

Authors:  W J MacDonald; L Monik
Journal:  Hosp Q       Date:  2001

3.  Neglect of the inpatient: the hospitalist movement in Canada responds.

Authors:  A Day; L MacMillan
Journal:  Hosp Q       Date:  2001

4.  Comparison of a family practice teaching service and a hospitalist model: costs, charges, length of stay, and mortality.

Authors:  L E Tingle; C T Lambert
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  Trends in hospital medicine: hospitalist advantages revealed.

Authors:  F A Michota
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.321

6.  Effects of hospitalists on cost, outcomes, and patient satisfaction in a rural health system.

Authors:  K M Davis; K E Koch; J K Harvey; R Wilson; J Englert; P D Gerard
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Effects of an HMO hospitalist program on inpatient utilization.

Authors:  C Molinari; R Short
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Pediatric hospitalists: quality care for the underserved?

Authors:  R D Wells; B Dahl; S D Wilson
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  Hospital care by hospital-based and clinic-based faculty: a prospective, controlled trial.

Authors:  P J Kearns; C C Wang; W J Morris; D G Low; A S Deacon; S Y Chan; W A Jensen
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-01-22

10.  A pneumonia practice guideline and a hospitalist-based reorganization lead to equivalent efficiency gains.

Authors:  J C Reddy; P P Katz; L Goldman; R M Wachter
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.229

View more
  1 in total

1.  Are inpatients' needs better served by hospitalists than by their family doctors?: no.

Authors:  Galt Wilson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.275

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.