Literature DB >> 18077631

Differences in potential for selection of clindamycin-resistant mutants between inducible erm(A) and erm(C) Staphylococcus aureus genes.

Claire Daurel1, Corinne Huet, Anne Dhalluin, Michèle Bes, Jerome Etienne, Roland Leclercq.   

Abstract

In staphylococci, inducible macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLS(B)) resistance is conferred by the erm(C) or erm(A) gene. This phenotype is characterized by the erythromycin-clindamycin "D-zone" test. Although clindamycin appears active in vitro, exposure of MLS(B)-inducible Staphylococcus aureus to this antibiotic may result in the selection of clindamycin-resistant mutants, either in vitro or in vivo. We have compared the frequencies of mutation to clindamycin resistance for 28 isolates of S. aureus inducibly resistant to erythromycin and bearing the erm(C) (n = 18) or erm(A) (n = 10) gene. Seven isolates susceptible to erythromycin or bearing the msr(A) gene (efflux) were used as controls. The frequencies of mutation to clindamycin resistance for the erm(A) isolates (mean +/- standard deviation, 3.4 x 10(-8) +/- 2.4 x 10(-8)) were only slightly higher than those for the controls (1.1 x 10(-8) +/- 6.4 x 10(-9)). By contrast, erm(C) isolates displayed a mean frequency of mutation to clindamycin resistance (4.7 x 10(-7) +/- 5.5 x 10(-7)) 14-fold higher than that of the S. aureus isolates with erm(A). The difference was also observed, although to a lower extent, when erm(C) and erm(A) were cloned into S. aureus RN4220. We conclude that erm(C) and erm(A) have different genetic potentials for selection of clindamycin-resistant mutants. By the disk diffusion method, erm(C) and erm(A) isolates could be distinguished on the basis of high- and low-level resistance to oleandomycin, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18077631      PMCID: PMC2238126          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01925-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  16 in total

1.  Should clindamycin be used in treatment of patients with infections caused by erythromycin-resistant staphylococci?

Authors:  G G Rao
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Distribution of genes encoding resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins among staphylococci.

Authors:  G Lina; A Quaglia; M E Reverdy; R Leclercq; F Vandenesch; J Etienne
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Modes and modulations of antibiotic resistance gene expression.

Authors:  Florence Depardieu; Isabelle Podglajen; Roland Leclercq; Ekkehard Collatz; Patrice Courvalin
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  A pair of mobilizable shuttle vectors conferring resistance to spectinomycin for molecular cloning in Escherichia coli and in gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  P Trieu-Cuot; C Carlier; C Poyart-Salmeron; P Courvalin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-07-25       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococci: should clinicians and microbiologists be concerned?

Authors:  James S Lewis; James H Jorgensen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Nucleotide sequence and functional map of pE194, a plasmid that specifies inducible resistance to macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin type B antibodies.

Authors:  S Horinouchi; B Weisblum
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Subinhibitory clindamycin differentially inhibits transcription of exoprotein genes in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  S Herbert; P Barry; R P Novick
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 8.  Epidemiology and treatment of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in children.

Authors:  John F Marcinak; Arthur L Frank
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.091

9.  Failure of clindamycin treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus expressing inducible clindamycin resistance in vitro.

Authors:  George K Siberry; Tsigereda Tekle; Karen Carroll; James Dick
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Global distribution of Panton-Valentine leukocidin--positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 2006.

Authors:  Anne Tristan; Michele Bes; Helene Meugnier; Gerard Lina; Bülent Bozdogan; Patrice Courvalin; Marie-Elisabeth Reverdy; Mark C Enright; François Vandenesch; Jerome Etienne
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  10 in total

1.  Incidence of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius from dogs.

Authors:  Randi M Gold; Sara D Lawhon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Adherence to CLSI recommendations for testing of Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Louisiana hospitals: report of a clinical failure and results of a questionnaire study.

Authors:  Kamakshya P Patra; John A Vanchiere; Joseph A Bocchini
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Performance of an agar dilution method and a Vitek 2 card for detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus spp.

Authors:  Christian Lavallée; Danielle Rouleau; Christiane Gaudreau; Michel Roger; Catherine Tsimiklis; Marie-Claude Locas; Simon Gagnon; Jocelyn Delorme; Annie-Claude Labbé
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  A report on infection dynamics of inducible clindamycin resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from a teaching hospital in India.

Authors:  Debasmita Dubey; Shakti Rath; Mahesh C Sahu; Subhrajita Rout; Nagen K Debata; Rabindra N Padhy
Journal:  Asian Pac J Trop Biomed       Date:  2013-02

5.  Phenotypic and genotypic study of macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin B (MLSB) resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in Tehran, Iran.

Authors:  Horieh Saderi; Behzad Emadi; Parviz Owlia
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-02

6.  Fusidic acid and clindamycin resistance in community-associated, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in children of Central Greece.

Authors:  George D Katopodis; Ioanna N Grivea; Angeliki J Tsantsaridou; Spyros Pournaras; Efi Petinaki; George A Syrogiannopoulos
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 3.090

7.  Macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin resistance phenotypes and genotypes of coagulase-positive Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates from bovine mastitis.

Authors:  Longping Li; Weiwei Feng; Zhiping Zhang; Huping Xue; Xin Zhao
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 8.  Pediatric Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Osteoarticular Infections.

Authors:  Ashlesha Kaushik; Helen Kest
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2018-05-04

9.  An approach to identifying drug resistance associated mutations in bacterial strains.

Authors:  Michal Wozniak; Jerzy Tiuryn; Limsoon Wong
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Phenotypic and molecular characterization of resistance to macrolides, lincosamides and type B streptogramin of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus spp. of a university hospital in Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.

Authors:  Jussyêgles Niedja da Paz Pereira; Marcelle Aquino Rabelo; Jailton Lobo da Costa Lima; Armando Monteiro Bezerra Neto; Ana Catarina de Souza Lopes; Maria Amélia Vieira Maciel
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 3.257

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.