Literature DB >> 18076235

A kinetic and electromyographic comparison of the standing cable press and bench press.

Juan Carlos Santana1, Francisco J Vera-Garcia, Stuart M McGill.   

Abstract

This study compared the standing cable press (SCP) and the traditional bench press (BP) to better understand the biomechanical limitations of pushing from a standing position together with the activation amplitudes of trunk and shoulder muscles. A static biomechanical model (4D Watbak) was used to assess the forces that can be pushed with 2 arms in a standing position. Then, 14 recreationally trained men performed 1 repetition maximum (1RM) BP and 1RM single-arm SP exercises while superficial electromyography (EMG) of various shoulder and torso muscles was measured. The 1RM BP performance resulted in an average load (74.2 +/- 17.6 kg) significantly higher than 1RM single-arm SP (26.0 +/- 4.4 kg). In addition, the model predicted that pushing forces from a standing position under ideal mechanical conditions are limited to 40.8% of the subject's body weight. For the 1RM BP, anterior deltoid and pectoralis major were more activated than most of the trunk muscles. In contrast, for the 1RM single-arm SP, the left internal oblique and left latissimus dorsi activities were similar to those of the anterior deltoid and pectoralis major. The EMG amplitudes of pectoralis major and the erector muscles were larger for 1RM BP. Conversely, the activation levels of left abdominal muscles and left latissimus dorsi were higher for 1RM right-arm SP. The BP emphasizes the activation of the shoulder and chest muscles and challenges the capability to develop great shoulder torques. The SCP performance also relies on the strength of shoulder and chest musculature; however, it is whole-body stability and equilibrium together with joint stability that present the major limitation in force generation. Our EMG findings show that SCP performance is limited by the activation and neuromuscular coordination of torso muscles, not maximal muscle activation of the chest and shoulder muscles. This has implications for the utility of these exercise approaches to achieve different training goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18076235     DOI: 10.1519/R-20476.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  12 in total

1.  Muscle activity of the core during bilateral, unilateral, seated and standing resistance exercise.

Authors:  Atle Hole Saeterbakken; Marius Steiro Fimland
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Core Stability in Athletes: A Critical Analysis of Current Guidelines.

Authors:  Klaus Wirth; Hagen Hartmann; Christoph Mickel; Elena Szilvas; Michael Keiner; Andre Sander
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Prediction of in-season shoulder injury from preseason testing in division I collegiate football players.

Authors:  Marisa Pontillo; Bryan A Spinelli; Brian J Sennett
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 4.  A systematic review of surface electromyography analyses of the bench press movement task.

Authors:  Petr Stastny; Artur Gołaś; Dusan Blazek; Adam Maszczyk; Michał Wilk; Przemysław Pietraszewski; Miroslav Petr; Petr Uhlir; Adam Zając
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Interpreting Signal Amplitudes in Surface Electromyography Studies in Sport and Rehabilitation Sciences.

Authors:  Andrew D Vigotsky; Israel Halperin; Gregory J Lehman; Gabriel S Trajano; Taian M Vieira
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Effect of Barbell Weight on the Structure of the Flat Bench Press.

Authors:  Henryk Król; Artur Gołaś
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  The effects of performing integrated compared to isolated core exercises.

Authors:  Atle Hole Saeterbakken; Ajit Chaudhari; Roland van den Tillaar; Vidar Andersen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Differences in unilateral chest press muscle activation and kinematics on a stable versus unstable surface while holding one versus two dumbbells.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Patterson; Andrew D Vigotsky; Nicole E Oppenheimer; Erin H Feser
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Effect of Fatigue Upon Performance and Electromyographic Activity in 6-RM Bench Press.

Authors:  Roland van den Tillaar; Atle Saeterbakken
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.193

10.  Muscular activity patterns of female and male athletes during the flat bench press.

Authors:  Artur Gołaś; Adam Maszczyk; Przemysław Pietraszewski; Michał Wilk; Petr Stastny; Katarzyna Strońska; Marcin Studencki; Adam Zając
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 2.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.