| Literature DB >> 18075705 |
John G Day1, Maike Iorenz, Thomas A Wilding, Thomas Friedl, Keith Harding, Thomas Pröschold, Debra Brennan, Julia Müller, Lília M A Santos, M Fátima Santos, Hugo C Osório, Raquel Amaral, Alena Lukesova, Pavel Hrouzek, Martin Lukes, Josef Elster, Jaromír Lukavsky, Ian Probert, Matthew J Ryan, Erica E Benson.
Abstract
Two cryopreservation methods, colligative cryoprotection coupled with controlled cooling and vitrification-based, encapsulation-dehydration were validated by five members of the EU research infrastructure consortium, COBRA, and two independent external validators. The test strain Chlorella vulgaris SAG 211-11b was successfully cryopreserved using two-step cooling employing passive (Mr Frosty) and Controlled Rate Freezers (CRF) attaining the desired recovery target within 15% of the median viability level (94%). Significant differences (p < 0.05) between cooling regimes were observed where Mr Frosty was more variable (Inter-Quartile Range being 21.5%, versus 13.0% for CRF samples). Viability assessment using fluorescein diacetate gave significantly (P < 0.0001) higher survival than growth in agar with median values being 96% and 89%, respectively. On employing encapsulation-dehydration, greater variability between some validators was observed, with six labs observing recovery in 100% of the beads (84-95% of cells surviving) and one lab observing survival in 80% of the treated beads. Bead disruption followed by algal growth in agar was considered the most reliable and accurate method of assessing cell survival for encapsulation-dehydration.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 18075705
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cryo Letters ISSN: 0143-2044 Impact factor: 1.066