Literature DB >> 18075404

Psychometric properties of the Doloplus-2 observational pain assessment scale and comparison to self-assessment in hospitalized elderly.

Sophie Pautex1, François R Herrmann, Agnès Michon, Panteleimon Giannakopoulos, Gabriel Gold.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Self-report is the "gold standard" for pain assessment, however, observational pain scales, such as Doloplus-2 must be used for patients who cannot communicate. In this follow-up study, we report the psychometric properties of the observational Doloplus-2 scale using the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score as a gold standard and evaluate its performance.
METHOD: Prospective clinical study of 180 hospitalized older patients who demonstrated good comprehension and reliable use of the VAS: 131 participants with dementia and 49 without. All participants assessed their chronic pain using the VAS. Doloplus-2 was independently completed by the nursing team.
RESULTS: Mean age of patients (133 women, 47 men) was 83.7+/-6.5. Median mini-mental state examination of patients with diagnosis of dementia was 18.0+/-7.7. Nearly half of the patients (49%) reported that they experienced pain in response to a direct question. The administration of Doloplus-2 was possible in all 180 patients. Doloplus-2 correlated moderately with self-assessment (Spearman coefficient: 0.46). In a multiple regression model, Doloplus-2 predicted 41% of the variability in pain intensity measured by VAS. The somatic dimension alone explained 36% of the variance, the psychosocial bloc 5% with no better contribution of the psychomotor bloc. To shorten Doloplus-2, we constructed a version with only the 5 items that were significantly associated with the VAS score in the multiple regression models. DISCUSSION: The observational Doloplus-2 scale correlates moderately with self-assessment pain score and has adequate internal consistency. Our data also suggest that Doloplus-2 could be substantially shortened as the brief version performed similarly to the complete Doloplus-2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18075404     DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318154b6e3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  12 in total

1.  Improving the pharmacologic management of pain in older adults: identifying the research gaps and methods to address them.

Authors:  M Cary Reid; David A Bennett; Wen G Chen; Basil A Eldadah; John T Farrar; Bruce Ferrell; Rollin M Gallagher; Joseph T Hanlon; Keela Herr; Susan D Horn; Charles E Inturrisi; Salma Lemtouni; Yu Woody Lin; Kaleb Michaud; R Sean Morrison; Tuhina Neogi; Linda L Porter; Daniel H Solomon; Michael Von Korff; Karen Weiss; James Witter; Kevin L Zacharoff
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 2.  Gaps in Aging Research as it Applies to Rheumatologic Clinical Care.

Authors:  Una E Makris; Devyani Misra; Raymond Yung
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.076

3.  Practice guidelines for assessing pain in older persons with dementia residing in long-term care facilities.

Authors:  Thomas Hadjistavropoulos; Theresa Dever Fitzgerald; Gregory P Marchildon
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 4.  Low back pain: critical assessment of various scales.

Authors:  Amit Garg; Hardik Pathak; Maxim V Churyukanov; Rajendra B Uppin; Tatyana M Slobodin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Assessment and treatment of pain in people with dementia.

Authors:  Anne Corbett; Bettina Husebo; Marzia Malcangio; Amelia Staniland; Jiska Cohen-Mansfield; Dag Aarsland; Clive Ballard
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 6.  Measurement properties, feasibility and clinical utility of the Doloplus-2 pain scale in older adults with cognitive impairment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hanne Marie Rostad; Inger Utne; Ellen Karine Grov; Martine Puts; Liv Halvorsrud
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.921

7.  Pain in severe dementia: A comparison of a fine-grained assessment approach to an observational checklist designed for clinical settings.

Authors:  T Hadjistavropoulos; M E Browne; K M Prkachin; B Taati; A Ashraf; A Mihailidis
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.931

8.  The Assessment of Pain in Older People: UK National Guidelines.

Authors:  Pat Schofield
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 10.668

9.  Developing a Pain Intensity Measure for Persons with Dementia: Initial Construction and Testing.

Authors:  Mary Ersek; Keela Herr; Michelle M Hilgeman; Moni Blazej Neradilek; Nayak Polissar; Karon F Cook; Princess Nash; A Lynn Snow; Meghan McDarby; Francis X Nelson
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.637

10.  Validity of the Korean Version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability Scale for Assessment of Pain in Dementia Patients.

Authors:  Yeonsil Moon; Yoon Sook Kim; Jongmin Lee; Seol Heui Han
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.