OBJECT: The objectives of this study were to examine whether the systemic administration of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) and its long-lasting derivative darbepoetin alfa expedited functional recovery in a rat model of sciatic nerve injury, and to compare the effects of these agents in the model. METHODS: Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats received a crush injury to the left sciatic nerve and subsequently underwent either placebo treatment, daily injections of rHuEPO, or weekly injections of darbepoetin alfa. RESULTS: Both rHuEPO and darbepoetin alfa were effective in reducing neurological impairment and improving compound muscle action potentials following nerve injury. Darbepoetin alfa, however, shortened the duration of peripheral nerve recovery'and facilitated recovery from the neurological and electrophysiological impairment following crush injury significantly better than rHuEPO. Examination of the footprint length factor data revealed that darbepoetin alfa-treated animals recovered preinjury function by postoperative Day 10, 4 days earlier than animals treated with rHuEPO and 11 days earlier than animals treated with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that recovery of neurological function in a model of peripheral nerve injury is more rapid with weekly administration of darbepoetin alfa than with daily rHuEPO treatment. Agents that facilitate nerve regeneration have the potential to limit the extent of motor endplate loss and muscle atrophy. The administration of EPO in its long-lasting recombinant forms affords significant neuroprotection in peripheral nerve injury models and may hold promise for future clinical applications.
OBJECT: The objectives of this study were to examine whether the systemic administration of recombinant humanerythropoietin (rHuEPO) and its long-lasting derivative darbepoetin alfa expedited functional recovery in a rat model of sciatic nerve injury, and to compare the effects of these agents in the model. METHODS: Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats received a crush injury to the left sciatic nerve and subsequently underwent either placebo treatment, daily injections of rHuEPO, or weekly injections of darbepoetin alfa. RESULTS: Both rHuEPO and darbepoetin alfa were effective in reducing neurological impairment and improving compound muscle action potentials following nerve injury. Darbepoetin alfa, however, shortened the duration of peripheral nerve recovery'and facilitated recovery from the neurological and electrophysiological impairment following crush injury significantly better than rHuEPO. Examination of the footprint length factor data revealed that darbepoetin alfa-treated animals recovered preinjury function by postoperative Day 10, 4 days earlier than animals treated with rHuEPO and 11 days earlier than animals treated with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that recovery of neurological function in a model of peripheral nerve injury is more rapid with weekly administration of darbepoetin alfa than with daily rHuEPO treatment. Agents that facilitate nerve regeneration have the potential to limit the extent of motor endplate loss and muscle atrophy. The administration of EPO in its long-lasting recombinant forms affords significant neuroprotection in peripheral nerve injury models and may hold promise for future clinical applications.
Authors: Kalpesh T Vakharia; Robin W Lindsay; Christopher Knox; Colin Edwards; Doug Henstrom; Julie Weinberg; Tessa A Hadlock; James T Heaton Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Max Modrak; M A Hassan Talukder; Khatuna Gurgenashvili; Mark Noble; John C Elfar Journal: J Neurosci Res Date: 2019-10-13 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Gen Inoue; Alban Gaultier; Xiaoqing Li; Elisabetta Mantuano; George Richardson; Kazuhisa Takahashi; W Marie Campana Journal: Glia Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 7.452
Authors: Elisabeth A Kappos; Patricia Baenziger-Sieber; Mathias Tremp; Patricia E Engels; Sarah Thommen; Lima Sprenger; Robyn M Benz; Dirk J Schaefer; Stefan Schaeren; Daniel Felix Kalbermatten Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 2.708