Literature DB >> 18073090

Farm practices to control E. coli O157 in young cattle--a randomised controlled trial.

Johanne Ellis-Iversen1, Richard P Smith, Steven Van Winden, Giles A Paiba, Eamon Watson, Lucy C Snow, Alasdair J C Cook.   

Abstract

A randomised controlled trial was used to investigate the effect of three complex management intervention packages to reduce the burden of E. coli O157 in groups of young-stock on cattle farms in England and Wales. All intervention farms were assigned measures to avoid buying in new animals and having direct contact or sharing water sources with other cattle. Furthermore, package A (7 farms) aimed to keep a clean environment and closed groups of young-stock; package B (14 farms) aimed for improved water and feed hygiene, whilst package C was assigned both A and B. The control farms (26 farms) were asked not to alter their practices. Farms, which were assigned intervention package A, exhibited a 48% reduction in E. coli O157 burden over the 4.5 months (average) of observation, compared to 18% on the control farms. The effect of package A compared to the control farms in a crude intention-to-treat model was RR = 0.26 (p=0.122). When the risk ratio was adjusted for actual application of the different measures, the effect of intervention package A became stronger and statistically significant (RR = 0.14 p=0.032). Statistical evidence (p< 0.05) showed that dry bedding and maintaining animals in the same groups were the most important measures within the package and weak evidence (p< 0.1) showed that a closed herd policy and no contact with other cattle may also be of importance. Compliance with the other measures in package A had no influence on the effect of the package. No evidence of effect of the other two intervention packages was found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18073090     DOI: 10.1051/vetres:2007041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Res        ISSN: 0928-4249            Impact factor:   3.683


  5 in total

1.  Biosecurity on cattle farms: a study in north-west England.

Authors:  Marnie L Brennan; Robert M Christley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Cost-effectiveness of farm interventions for reducing the prevalence of VTEC O157 on UK dairy farms.

Authors:  N A Lyons; R P Smith; J Rushton
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 4.434

Review 3.  Interventions for preventing diarrhea-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome: systematic review.

Authors:  Diana E Thomas; Elizabeth J Elliott
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  A longitudinal study of risk factors for shedding of VTEC O157 by young cattle in herds with known E. coli O157 carriage.

Authors:  R P Smith; W J Pollitt; G A Paiba
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.434

Review 5.  Shiga Toxin-Associated Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Adrien Joseph; Aurélie Cointe; Patricia Mariani Kurkdjian; Cédric Rafat; Alexandre Hertig
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 4.546

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.