Literature DB >> 18072481

Radiological interpretation 2020: toward quantitative image assessment.

John M Boone1.   

Abstract

The interpretation of medical images by radiologists is primarily and fundamentally a subjective activity, but there are a number of clinical applications such as tumor imaging where quantitative imaging (QI) metrics (such as tumor growth rate) would be valuable to the patient's care. It is predicted that the subjective interpretive environment of the past will, over the next decade, evolve toward the increased use of quantitative metrics for evaluating patient health from images. The increasing sophistication and resolution of modern tomographic scanners promote the development of meaningful quantitative end points, determined from images which are in turn produced using well-controlled imaging protocols. For the QI environment to expand, medical physicists, physicians, other researchers and equipment vendors need to work collaboratively to develop the quantitative protocols for imaging, scanner calibrations, and robust analytical software that will lead to the routine inclusion of quantitative parameters in the diagnosis and therapeutic assessment of human health. Most importantly, quantitative metrics need to be developed which have genuine impact on patient diagnosis and welfare, and only then will QI techniques become integrated into the clinical environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18072481     DOI: 10.1118/1.2789501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  16 in total

1.  Impact of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system integrated into a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) on reader sensitivity and efficiency for the detection of lung nodules in thoracic CT exams.

Authors:  Luca Bogoni; Jane P Ko; Jeffrey Alpert; Vikram Anand; John Fantauzzi; Charles H Florin; Chi Wan Koo; Derek Mason; William Rom; Maria Shiau; Marcos Salganicoff; David P Naidich
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Single image signal-to-noise ratio estimation for magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  K S Sim; M A Lai; C P Tso; C C Teo
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 3.  Shifting from region of interest (ROI) to voxel-based analysis in human brain mapping.

Authors:  Loukas G Astrakas; Maria I Argyropoulou
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-05-13

Review 4.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Imaging-based observational databases for clinical problem solving: the role of informatics.

Authors:  Alex A T Bui; William Hsu; Corey Arnold; Suzie El-Saden; Denise R Aberle; Ricky K Taira
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Repeatability and reproducibility of 3D MR fingerprinting relaxometry measurements in normal breast tissue.

Authors:  Ananya Panda; Yong Chen; Kathleen Ropella-Panagis; Satyam Ghodasara; Marcie Stopchinski; Nicole Seyfried; Katherine Wright; Nicole Seiberlich; Mark Griswold; Vikas Gulani
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Automated tracking of quantitative assessments of tumor burden in clinical trials.

Authors:  Daniel L Rubin; Debra Willrett; Martin J O'Connor; Cleber Hage; Camille Kurtz; Dilvan A Moreira
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 8.  Methods and challenges in quantitative imaging biomarker development.

Authors:  Richard G Abramson; Kirsteen R Burton; John-Paul J Yu; Ernest M Scalzetti; Thomas E Yankeelov; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Mishal Mendiratta-Lala; Brian J Bartholmai; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Leon Lenchik; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 9.  Volumetric analysis at abdominal CT: oncologic and non-oncologic applications.

Authors:  Virginia B Planz; Meghan G Lubner; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Lung volume measurements as a surrogate marker for patient response in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Zacariah E Labby; Samuel G Armato; James J Dignam; Christopher Straus; Hedy L Kindler; Anna K Nowak
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 15.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.