OBJECTIVES: To use growth mixture modelling (GMM) to identify subgroups of children with attention deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD) who have different pharmacodynamic profiles in response to extended release methylphenidate as assessed in a laboratory classroom setting. METHODS: GMM analysis was performed on data from the COMACS study (Comparison of Methylphenidates in the Analog Classroom Setting): a large (n = 184) placebo-controlled cross-over study comparing three treatment conditions in the Laboratory School Protocol (with a 1.5-h cycle of attention and deportment assessments). Two orally administered, once-daily methylphenidate (MPH) bioequivalent formulations [Metadate CD/Equasym XL (MCD-EQXL) and Concerta XL (CON)] were compared with placebo (PLA). RESULTS: Three classes of children with distinct severity profiles in the PLA condition were identified. For both MCD-EQXL and CON, the more severe their PLA symptoms the better, the children's response. However, the formulations produced different growth curves by class, with CON having essentially a flat profile for all three classes (i.e. no effect of PLA severity) and MCD-EQXL showing a marked decline in symptoms immediately post-dosing in the two most severe classes compared with the least severe. Comparison of daily doses matched for immediate-release (IR) components accounted for this difference. CONCLUSION: The results suggest considerable heterogeneity in the pharmacodynamics of MPH response by children with ADHD. When treatment response for near-equal, bioequivalent daily doses the two formulations was compared, marked differences were seen for children in the most severe classes with a strong curvilinear trajectory for MCD-EQXL related to the greater IR component.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To use growth mixture modelling (GMM) to identify subgroups of children with attention deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD) who have different pharmacodynamic profiles in response to extended release methylphenidate as assessed in a laboratory classroom setting. METHODS: GMM analysis was performed on data from the COMACS study (Comparison of Methylphenidates in the Analog Classroom Setting): a large (n = 184) placebo-controlled cross-over study comparing three treatment conditions in the Laboratory School Protocol (with a 1.5-h cycle of attention and deportment assessments). Two orally administered, once-daily methylphenidate (MPH) bioequivalent formulations [Metadate CD/Equasym XL (MCD-EQXL) and Concerta XL (CON)] were compared with placebo (PLA). RESULTS: Three classes of children with distinct severity profiles in the PLA condition were identified. For both MCD-EQXL and CON, the more severe their PLA symptoms the better, the children's response. However, the formulations produced different growth curves by class, with CON having essentially a flat profile for all three classes (i.e. no effect of PLA severity) and MCD-EQXL showing a marked decline in symptoms immediately post-dosing in the two most severe classes compared with the least severe. Comparison of daily doses matched for immediate-release (IR) components accounted for this difference. CONCLUSION: The results suggest considerable heterogeneity in the pharmacodynamics of MPH response by children with ADHD. When treatment response for near-equal, bioequivalent daily doses the two formulations was compared, marked differences were seen for children in the most severe classes with a strong curvilinear trajectory for MCD-EQXL related to the greater IR component.
Authors: Tobias Banaschewski; David Coghill; Paramala Santosh; Alessandro Zuddas; Philip Asherson; Jan Buitelaar; Marina Danckaerts; Manfred Döpfner; Stephen V Faraone; Aribert Rothenberger; Joseph Sergeant; Hans-Christoph Steinhausen; Edmund J S Sonuga-Barke; Eric Taylor Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2006-05-05 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: L L Greenhill; H B Abikoff; L E Arnold; D P Cantwell; C K Conners; G Elliott; L Hechtman; S P Hinshaw; B Hoza; P S Jensen; J S March; J Newcorn; W E Pelham; J B Severe; J M Swanson; B Vitiello; K Wells Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1996-10 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: M A González; H S Pentikis; N Anderl; M F Benedict; H H DeCory; S J Hirshey Dirksen; S J Hatch Journal: Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 1.366
Authors: James Swanson; Suneel Gupta; Andrew Lam; Ira Shoulson; Marc Lerner; Nishit Modi; Elizabeth Lindemulder; Sharon Wigal Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2003-02
Authors: Edmund J S Sonuga-Barke; James M Swanson; David Coghill; Heleen H DeCory; Simon J Hatch Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2004-09-30 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: L Eugene Arnold; Stephen J Ganocy; Katherine Mount; Eric A Youngstrom; Thomas Frazier; Mary Fristad; Sarah M Horwitz; Boris Birmaher; Robert Findling; Robert A Kowatch; Christine Demeter; David Axelson; Mary Kay Gill; Linda Marsh Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Ole Jakob Storebø; Erica Ramstad; Helle B Krogh; Trine Danvad Nilausen; Maria Skoog; Mathilde Holmskov; Susanne Rosendal; Camilla Groth; Frederik L Magnusson; Carlos R Moreira-Maia; Donna Gillies; Kirsten Buch Rasmussen; Dorothy Gauci; Morris Zwi; Richard Kirubakaran; Bente Forsbøl; Erik Simonsen; Christian Gluud Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-11-25