Literature DB >> 18071774

[Ureterocystoplasty in the treatment of "low-compliance" bladder in children].

S Hauser1, C Fisang, F Fechner, J Ellinger, A Haferkamp, S C Müller.   

Abstract

In cases of inadequate or insufficient conservative treatment of non-compliant bladders the function of the upper urinary tract is jeopardized. We present our experience with ureterocystoplasty as one possible treatment option.A total of eight children underwent ureterocystoplasty. The etiology of bladder non-compliance and the need for augmentation was neurogenic in five children, posterior urethral valves in two children, and in one child after repeated antireflux surgery. In all patients the kidney of the used ureter was functionless. Surgery was done through a transperitoneal approach. Following nephrectomy, the renal pelvis and the ureter were spatulated and sutured into the bladder incision. An additional MACE procedure was performed in three patients, antireflux surgery for the contralateral kidney in two patients, and one patient underwent stone removal in the remaining kidney. In one patient the ureter was used as a free transplant and was covered by an omental flap. In addition a simultaneous living donor kidney transplant was performed. The storage function could be improved in all patients. The function of the ureter which was used as a free transplant showed good clinical results. The longest follow-up is 8 years. Ureterocystoplasty is a useful and metabolically neutral alternative to bowel segments. In patients with only one functioning kidney and a contralateral megaureter, ureterocystoplasty is the treatment of choice in our institution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18071774     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-007-1589-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  17 in total

Review 1.  Bladder augmentation in children: where have we been and where are we going?

Authors:  M E Mitchell
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Augmentation ureterocystoplasty: is it the preferred choice?

Authors:  P M R Carneiro; J Binyamini; M Sofer; J Ben-Chaim
Journal:  East Afr Med J       Date:  2005-05

3.  Clinical and urodynamic evaluation after ureterocystoplasty with different amounts of tissue.

Authors:  R Zubieta; F de Badiola; J M Escala; M Castellan; J C Puigdevall; K Ramírez; R Ramírez; E Ruiz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Ureterocystoplasty update.

Authors:  M F Bellinger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Ureterocystoplasty: a unique method for vesical augmentation in children.

Authors:  M F Bellinger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Augmentation ureterocystoplasty.

Authors:  J S Wolf; C W Turzan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Single distal ureter for ureterocystoplasty: a safe first choice tissue for bladder augmentation.

Authors:  L A Pascual; L M Sentagne; J M Vega-Perugorría; F I de Badiola; J C Puigdevall; E Ruiz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Metabolic consequences of continent urinary diversion.

Authors:  R D Mills; U E Studer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Metabolic consequences and long-term complications of enterocystoplasty in children: a review.

Authors:  Scott M Gilbert; Terry W Hensle
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  [Ureterocystoplasty: functional results and possible problem areas].

Authors:  A Haferkamp; D Melchior; S Schumacher; S C Müller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-03-13       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.