Literature DB >> 18071620

Cost-effective screening for urinary tract infections in urogynaecological patients.

H F Wong1, L C Lee, H C Han.   

Abstract

This study aims to test the cost-effectiveness of reagent-strip urine nitrite compared with microbiological laboratory testing for screening of urinary tract infections (UTI). The study is a retrospective review of 708 female patients who underwent cystometry during a 1-year period. Urine dipstick nitrite was used as a screening test for UTI while urine cultures were taken as an outcome. Symptoms of UTI were noted. Of 708 patients screened, 70 (9.9%) had a significant UTI. Only 32 (4.5%)of 708 patients were nitrite positive. Urine dipstick nitrite has sensitivity of 40%, specificity of 99%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 88 % and negative predictive value (NPV) of 94%. If the screening test included symptoms for UTI together with urine nitrite, the results are: sensitivity 89%, specificity 31%, PPV 12% and NPV 96%. A combination of screening with urine nitrite and UTI symptoms can increase sensitivity to 89%. A total of 29% of specimens (screen negative=nitrite negative/asymptomatic) can then be excluded from UFEME/culture testing, thus resulting in cost savings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18071620     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-007-0502-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  8 in total

1.  Asymptomatic infections of the urinary tract.

Authors:  E H KASS
Journal:  Trans Assoc Am Physicians       Date:  1956

2.  The management of suspected urinary tract infection in general practice.

Authors:  D Brooks
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Urinalysis, critical discipline of clinical science.

Authors:  A H Free; H M Free
Journal:  CRC Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  1972-12

4.  Further evaluation of the Griess test to detect significant bacteriuria. II.

Authors:  A W Czerwinski; R G Wilkerson; J A Merrill; B Braden; J P Colmore
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1971-07-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Utility of urine reagent strip in screening women with incontinence for urinary tract infection.

Authors:  Gunhilde M Buchsbaum; Danielle T Albushies; David S Guzick
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-07-01

6.  Disappointing dipstick screening for urinary tract infection in hospital inpatients.

Authors:  Z Zaman; A Borremans; J Verhaegen; L Verbist; N Blanckaert
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  The urine dipstick test useful to rule out infections. A meta-analysis of the accuracy.

Authors:  Walter L J M Devillé; Joris C Yzermans; Nico P van Duijn; P Dick Bezemer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  The cost effectiveness of combined rapid tests (Multistix) in screening for urinary tract infections.

Authors:  G A Fowlis; J Waters; G Williams
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 18.000

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Utility of dipstick urinalysis in peri- and postmenopausal women with irritative bladder symptoms.

Authors:  Lindsay C Turner; Richard Beigi; Jonathan P Shepherd; Jerry L Lowder
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 2.894

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.