Literature DB >> 18071342

The effect of viscosity on ad libitum food intake.

N Zijlstra1, M Mars, R A de Wijk, M S Westerterp-Plantenga, C de Graaf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Energy-yielding liquids elicit weak suppressive appetite responses and weak compensatory responses, suggesting that liquid calories might lead to a positive energy balance. However, data is often derived from foods differing in many characteristics other than viscosity.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of viscosity on ad libitum food intake in real-life setting and to investigate whether a difference in ad libitum intake is related to eating rate and/or eating effort.
DESIGN: In real-life setting 108 nonrestrained subjects (26+/-7 years, BMI 22.7+/-2.4 kg m(-2)) received a chocolate flavored liquid, semi-liquid and semi-solid milk-based product, similar in palatability, macronutrient composition and energy density. In laboratory setting 49 nonrestrained subjects (24+/-6 years, BMI 22.2+/-2.3 kg m(-2)) received the liquid or semi-solid product. Effort and eating rate were controlled by means of a peristaltic pump.
RESULTS: In real-life setting the intake of the liquid (809+/-396 g) was respectively 14 and 30% higher compared to the semi-liquid (699+/-391 g) and semi-solid product (566+/-311 g; P<0.0001). In laboratory setting, removing eating effort, resulted in a 29% (P<0.0001) intake difference between liquid (319+/-176 g) and semi-solid (226+/-122 g). Standardizing eating rate resulted in 12% difference between liquid (200+/-106 g) and semi-solid (176+/-88 g; P=0.24). If not controlled, the difference in intake between liquid (419+/-216 g) and semi-solid (277+/-130 g) was comparable to the real-life setting (34%; P<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Products different in viscosity but similar in palatability, macronutrient composition and energy density lead to significant differences in intake. This difference is partially explained by the higher eating rate of liquids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18071342     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)        ISSN: 0307-0565            Impact factor:   5.095


  40 in total

Review 1.  Slow food, fast food and the control of food intake.

Authors:  Cees de Graaf; Frans J Kok
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 43.330

2.  Effects of learning and food form on energy intake and appetitive responses.

Authors:  Joshua B Jones; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-06-21

3.  Components of a cardioprotective diet: new insights.

Authors:  Dariush Mozaffarian; Lawrence J Appel; Linda Van Horn
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  The effect of fibre amount, energy level and viscosity of beverages containing oat fibre supplement on perceived satiety.

Authors:  Marika Lyly; Nora Ohls; Liisa Lähteenmäki; Marjatta Salmenkallio-Marttila; Kirsi-Helena Liukkonen; Leila Karhunen; Kaisa Poutanen
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Does milk matter: Is children's intake affected by the type or amount of milk served at a meal?

Authors:  Samantha M R Kling; Liane S Roe; Christine E Sanchez; Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  The effect of fruit in different forms on energy intake and satiety at a meal.

Authors:  Julie E Flood-Obbagy; Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Effect of sodium alginate addition to chocolate milk on glycemia, insulin, appetite and food intake in healthy adult men.

Authors:  D El Khoury; H D Goff; S Berengut; R Kubant; G H Anderson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Satiating capacity and post-prandial relationships between appetite parameters and gut-peptide concentrations with solid and liquefied carbohydrate.

Authors:  Mieke J I Martens; Sofie G T Lemmens; Jurriaan M Born; Margriet S Westerterp-Plantenga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The impact of food viscosity on eating rate, subjective appetite, glycemic response and gastric emptying rate.

Authors:  Yong Zhu; Walter H Hsu; James H Hollis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Consumption with large sip sizes increases food intake and leads to underestimation of the amount consumed.

Authors:  Dieuwerke P Bolhuis; Catriona M M Lakemond; Rene A de Wijk; Pieternel A Luning; Cees de Graaf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.