Literature DB >> 18070779

A multimedia tool for the informed consent of patients prior to gastric banding.

Carsten Eggers1, Rainer Obliers, Armin Koerfer, Walter Thomas, Karl Koehle, Arnulf H Hoelscher, Elfriede Bollschweiler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Severe obesity is a clear indication for appropriate, effective weight loss therapy. One option is operative intervention, e.g., gastric banding. Risks of the operation and therapeutic alternatives need to be comprehensibly presented to the patient. The literature has shown that better informed consent is obtained using information presented in a multimedia/video-based format. The current study developed and evaluated a multimedia program aimed at obtaining informed consent from obese patients before gastric banding. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURE: An interactive multimedia program was developed with information about preoperative examinations, the operation itself, hospital stay, operative risks, alternative therapies, and the pathophysiology and health risks of obesity. Two groups (Group 1, n = 20, mean age 38 years, informed consent attained with conventional document information; Group 2, n = 20, mean age 37 years, informed consent attained with additional multimedia information) were interviewed regarding comprehensibility of the information presented, personal satisfaction, and anxiety levels during the informed consent process.
RESULTS: Group 2 showed significantly better (p < 0.05) understanding of the presented information and higher levels of satisfaction with the informed consent process. Anxiety levels did not significantly differ between the two groups. DISCUSSION: Because patient satisfaction with the informed consent process and understanding of the presented information significantly improved, the multimedia program clearly benefits both surgeons and patients. Personal contact from the surgeon remains essential. High volumes of information presented in multimedia format do not alleviate patient anxiety, and personal contact may be beneficial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18070779     DOI: 10.1038/oby.2007.340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)        ISSN: 1930-7381            Impact factor:   5.002


  14 in total

1.  An audit of the knowledge and attitudes of doctors towards Surgical Informed Consent (SIC).

Authors:  Bushra Ashraf; Nasira Tasnim; Muhammad Saaiq; Khaleeq-Uz- Zaman
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-10-27

2.  iPads in Breast Imaging - A Phantom Study.

Authors:  M Hammon; P M Schlechtweg; R Schulz-Wendtland; M Uder; S A Schwab
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  A randomized, controlled trial of video supplementation on the cataract surgery informed consent process.

Authors:  Michael H Zhang; Zeeshan U Haq; Evan M Braithwaite; Noah C Simon; Kamran M Riaz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Can the documented patient briefing be carried out with an iPad app?

Authors:  Philipp Martin Schlechtweg; Matthias Hammon; Christian Heberlein; David Giese; Michael Uder; Siegfried Alexander Schwab
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient--2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Mechanick; Adrienne Youdim; Daniel B Jones; W Timothy Garvey; Daniel L Hurley; M Molly McMahon; Leslie J Heinberg; Robert Kushner; Ted D Adams; Scott Shikora; John B Dixon; Stacy Brethauer
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.002

6.  Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient--2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Mechanick; Adrienne Youdim; Daniel B Jones; W Timothy Garvey; Daniel L Hurley; M Molly McMahon; Leslie J Heinberg; Robert Kushner; Ted D Adams; Scott Shikora; John B Dixon; Stacy Brethauer
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 7.  A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions.

Authors:  Wouter K G Leclercq; Bram J Keulers; Marc R M Scheltinga; Paul H M Spauwen; Gert-Jan van der Wilt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Impact of a multimedia teaching tool on parental anxiety and knowledge during the informed consent process.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Paton; Sharon K Davis; Nan Gaylord; Xueyuan Cao; Ankush Gosain
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Breast Cancer Surgery Decision-Making and African-American Women.

Authors:  Jane R Schubart; Michelle A Farnan; Rena B Kass
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Multimedia Informed Consent Tool for a Low Literacy African Research Population: Development and Pilot-Testing.

Authors:  Muhammed Olanrewaju Afolabi; Kalifa Bojang; Umberto D'Alessandro; Egeruan Babatunde Imoukhuede; Raffaella M Ravinetto; Heidi Jane Larson; Nuala McGrath; Daniel Chandramohan
Journal:  J Clin Res Bioeth       Date:  2014-04-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.