Literature DB >> 18070199

Urodynamic evaluation of sacral neuromodulation for urge urinary incontinence.

Pieter M Groenendijk1, August A B Lycklama à Nyeholt, John P F A Heesakkers, Philip E V van Kerrebroeck, Magdy M Hassouna, Jerzy B Gajewski, Francesco Cappellano, Steven W Siegel, Magnus Fall, Hero E Dijkema, Udo Jonas, Ubi van den Hombergh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the urodynamic data before and 6 months after implantation of sacral neuromodulation (SNM, an established treatment for voiding dysfunction, including refractory urge urinary incontinence, UI) and to assess the correlation between the urodynamic data and clinical efficacy in patients with UI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 111 patients with a >50% reduction in UI symptoms during a percutaneous nerve evaluation test qualified for surgical implantation of SNM. Patients were categorized in two subgroups, i.e. those with UI with or without confirmed detrusor overactivity (DO) at baseline. At the 6-month follow-up all patients had a second urodynamic investigation, with the stimulator switched on.
RESULTS: At baseline, there was urodynamically confirmed DO in 67 patients, while 44 showed no DO. A review of filling cystometry variables showed a statistically significant improvement in bladder volumes at first sensation of filling (FSF) and at maximum fill volume (MFV) before voiding for both UI subgroups, compared with baseline. In 51% of the patients with UI and DO at baseline, the DO resolved during the follow-up. However, those patients were no more clinically successful than those who still had DO (P = 0.73). At the 6-month follow-up, 55 of 84 implanted patients showed clinical benefit, having a >or=50% improvement in primary voiding diary variables. Patients with UI but no DO had a higher rate of clinical success (73%) than patients with UI and DO (61%), but the difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: These urodynamic results show a statistically significant improvement in FSF and MFV in patients with UI with or with no DO after SNM. Although there was a urodynamic and clinical improvement in both groups, patients with UI but no DO are at least as successful as patients with UI and DO. Therefore in patients with UI, DO should not be a prerequisite selection criterion for using SNM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18070199     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07258.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  15 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of BTX-A and neuromodulation in treating OAB with or without detrusor overactivity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Suneetha Rachaneni; Pallavi Latthe
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Role of sacral neuromodulation in modern urogynaecology practice: a review of recent literature.

Authors:  Samina Tahseen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  [Sacral neuromodulation for refractory overactive bladder].

Authors:  Arndt van Ophoven
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Urodynamics in the evaluation of overactive bladder.

Authors:  Eric S Rovner; Colin M Goudelocke
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Novel biomarkers for overactive bladder.

Authors:  Rufus Cartwright; Iram Afshan; Alexandros Derpapas; Gopalan Vijaya; Vik Khullar
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Neuromodulation versus medication for overactive bladder: the case for early intervention.

Authors:  Frank N Burks; Kenneth M Peters
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  Neuromodulation for overactive bladder.

Authors:  Jamie Bartley; Jason Gilleran; Kenneth Peters
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 8.  [Sacral neuromodulation in under- and overactive detrusor-quo vadis? : Principles and developments].

Authors:  F Girtner; M Burger; R Mayr
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Predictive Factors in Sacral Neuromodulation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ranjana Jairam; Jamie Drossaerts; Tom Marcelissen; Gommert van Koeveringe; Desiree Vrijens; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 1.934

Review 10.  Treatment success for overactive bladder with urinary urge incontinence refractory to oral antimuscarinics: a review of published evidence.

Authors:  Jonathan D Campbell; Katharine S Gries; Jonathan H Watanabe; Arliene Ravelo; Roger R Dmochowski; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.