Literature DB >> 18069370

A 4- to 6-year retrospective clinical study of cracked teeth restored with bonded indirect resin composite onlays.

Antonio Signore1, Stefano Benedicenti, Ugo Covani, Giambattista Ravera.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical performance of bonded indirect resin composite onlays for the treatment of painful, cracked teeth over a 6-year period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three posterior teeth diagnosed as having a crack were selected in the restorative department of the University of Genoa. Inclusion criteria were sensitivity to biting and cold and a clinically visible crack. Direct composite buildup after removal of the existing restoration was performed before definitive cavity preparation. All composite onlay restorations were cemented with an adhesive technique using a 3-step total etch system and a dual-cure composite cement. Patients were interviewed and clinically examined at 1 week, 4 weeks, and every 6 months.
RESULTS: The effectiveness of bonded onlay restorations was evaluated for a mean observation time of 4.78 years. At 1 week, 38 (88.37%) restored teeth were free of pain, 3 (6.98%) still had sensitivity to cold, and 2 (4.65%) still had sensitivity to cold and chewing. At 4 weeks, 40 (93.02%) teeth were free of pain, 2 (4.65%) still had sensitivity to cold and chewing, and 1 (2.32%) needed endodontic treatment. Two other teeth (4.65%) also needed endodontic treatment, the first after 2 months and the second after 5 months. During the evaluation period, 3 restorations (6.98%) failed, and upon clinical examination, 40 (93.02%) teeth were free of symptoms with a 6-year survival rate of 93.02% (life table analysis).
CONCLUSIONS: Bonded indirect resin composite onlays can be successful in treating painful, cracked teeth. From the findings of this study, it appears that cuspal protection should be incorporated into the design of coronal restorations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18069370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  12 in total

Review 1.  The management of cracked tooth syndrome in dental practice.

Authors:  S Banerji; S B Mehta; B J Millar
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Do composite resin restorations protect cracked teeth? An in-vitro study.

Authors:  O Naka; B J Millar; D Sagris; C David
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 3.  Cracked teeth: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Erinne B Lubisich; Thomas J Hilton; Jack Ferracane
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.843

4.  Recommended treatment of cracked teeth: Results from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Thomas J Hilton; Ellen Funkhouser; Jack L Ferracane; Michele Schultz-Robins; Valeria V Gordan; Bobby J Bramblett; R Mack Snead; Walter Manning; Jeffrey R Remakel
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Outcomes of treatment and monitoring of posterior teeth with cracks: three-year results from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Jack L Ferracane; Thomas J Hilton; Ellen Funkhouser; Valeria V Gordan; Gregg H Gilbert; Rahma Mungia; Vanessa Burton; Cyril Meyerowitz; Dorota T Kopycka-Kedzierawski; National Dental Pbrn Collaborative Group
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Indirect resin composites.

Authors:  Suresh Nandini
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2010-10

7.  Analysis of the characteristics of cracked teeth and evaluation of pulp status according to periodontal probing depth.

Authors:  Sung-Eun Yang; A-Ra Jo; Hye-Jin Lee; Sin-Young Kim
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Clinical Behavior of Ceramic, Hybrid and Composite Onlays. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Naia Bustamante-Hernández; Jose María Montiel-Company; Carlos Bellot-Arcís; José Félix Mañes-Ferrer; María Fernanda Solá-Ruíz; Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Lucía Fernández-Estevan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Survival of Prosthodontic Restorations Luted with Resin-Based versus Composite-Based Cements: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ján Staněk; Abanoub Riad; Adam Le; Matěj Bernát; Milad Hammal; Basel Azar
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-02       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 10.  A systematic review of outcome measurements and quality of studies evaluating fixed tooth-supported restorations.

Authors:  Devangkumar Rajnikant Patel; Tim O'Brien; Aviva Petrie; Haralampos Petridis
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.