Literature DB >> 18069366

Chemical solubility and flexural strength of zirconia-based ceramics.

John Chai1, Frederick C S Chu, Tak W Chow, Bernard M H Liang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to investigate the chemical solubility and flexural strengths of 3 zirconia-based dental ceramics: In-Ceram Zirconia (IZ), In-Ceram 2000 YZ CUBES (YZ Zirconia) (Vita Zahnfabrik), and Cercon (Dentsply). A pressable lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramic (IPS Empress 2, Ivoclar Vivadent) was used as a control.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten block specimens (12 x 6 x 4 mm) of each ceramic material were prepared for chemical solubility testing. Each specimen was refluxed in 4% acetic acid solution for 16 hours. The percentage loss of mass and the loss of mass per unit of surface area for each specimen were calculated. Ten bar-shaped (21 x 5 x 2 mm) and 10 disk-shaped (16 mm diameter, 1.2 mm thickness) specimens of each ceramic material were prepared and tested for uniaxial flexural strength (UFS) and biaxial flexural strength (BFS). X-ray diffraction analyses were conducted to determine the relative amount of the monoclinic phase of the as-sintered and fractured surfaces of the zirconia ceramics.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences among the ceramics in chemical solubility by percentage mass or mass/surface area. For UFS, YZ Zirconia (899 +/- 109 MPa) > Cercon (458 +/- 95 MPa) IZ (409 +/- 60 MPa) > Empress 2 (252 +/- 36 MPa). For BFS, YZ Zirconia (1,107 +/- 116 MPa) > Cercon (927 +/- 146 MPa) > IZ (523 +/- 51 MPa) > Empress 2 (359 +/- 43 MPa). The fractured YZ Zirconia surface contained approximately 5 times as much monoclinic phase compared to that of its intact surface. The fractured IZ and Cercon surfaces contained approximately twice as much monoclinic phase compared to those of intact surfaces.
CONCLUSION: The ceramics tested all satisfied the chemical solubility allowance required of core ceramic material (type I, Class 1 or type II, Class 1) according to the International Organization for Standardization 6872:1995(E) specifications on dental ceramic. The zirconia-based ceramics possessed significantly higher flexural strengths than the control lithium disilicate ceramic. Their clinical application appears sufficiently promising for long-term clinical studies to be undertaken.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18069366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  7 in total

1.  Five-year prospective clinical study of posterior three-unit zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Roberto Sorrentino; Giorgio De Simone; Stefano Tetè; Simona Russo; Fernando Zarone
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Effect of heat-pressing temperature and holding time on the microstructure and flexural strength of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics.

Authors:  Fu Wang; Zhiguo Chai; Zaixi Deng; Jing Gao; Hui Wang; Jihua Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of anterior two-unit cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Filip Keulemans; Akikazu Shinya; Lippo V J Lassila; Pekka K Vallittu; Cornelis J Kleverlaan; Albert J Feilzer; Roeland J G De Moor
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-03-24

4.  Influence of Specimen Preparation and Test Methods on the Flexural Strength Results of Monolithic Zirconia Materials.

Authors:  Christine Schatz; Monika Strickstrock; Malgorzata Roos; Daniel Edelhoff; Marlis Eichberger; Isabella-Maria Zylla; Bogna Stawarczyk
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Effects of Marginal Bone Loss Progression on Stress Distribution in Different Implant-Abutment Connections and Abutment Materials: A 3D Finite Element Analysis Study.

Authors:  Ching-Ping Lin; Yi-Ting Shyu; Yu-Ling Wu; Ming-Hsu Tsai; Hung-Shyong Chen; Aaron Yu-Jen Wu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 6.  Zirconia in dental implantology: A review.

Authors:  Abhishek Apratim; Prashanti Eachempati; Kiran Kumar Krishnappa Salian; Vijendra Singh; Saurabh Chhabra; Sanket Shah
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2015 May-Jun

7.  Surrounding Tissue Response to Surface-Treated Zirconia Implants.

Authors:  Yohei Iinuma; Masatsugu Hirota; Tohru Hayakawa; Chikahiro Ohkubo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.