David C Roberts1, Mary Pat McKay, Alison Shaffer. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services, Washington, DC, USA.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: In 2005, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported increasing emergency department (ED) visit rates per 100 people. The greatest increase in visit rate was among individuals 65 years and older. Given that older ED visitors have longer lengths of stay in the ED, are more likely to be admitted, and compose a growing proportion of the American population, this finding could have a significant negative effect on ED crowding. The first step toward addressing this issue is a better understanding of the nature of these visits. METHODS: We performed trend analysis for persons aged 65 years and older using 1993 to 2003 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data, an annual national sample of visits to the EDs of nonfederal general and short-stay hospitals. SAS 9.1 computed population estimates and standard errors for number of ED visits. Annual census data were used to compute visit rates per 100 persons. A least-squares test for trend determined slopes and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Visits for patients aged 65 to 74 years increased 34% during the study period. The visit rate for blacks increased 93% to 77 visits per 100 population, whereas the rate for whites increased 26% to 36 visits per 100. The admission rate did not change significantly during the study period. The number of visits at which 3 or more medications were prescribed increased 44%. The increased visits occurred primarily in the category of "other and undefined" diagnoses (90% increase). CONCLUSION: If these trends continue, ED visits in the United States for the 65- to 74-year-old group could nearly double from 6.4 million visits to 11.7 million visits by 2013.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: In 2005, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported increasing emergency department (ED) visit rates per 100 people. The greatest increase in visit rate was among individuals 65 years and older. Given that older ED visitors have longer lengths of stay in the ED, are more likely to be admitted, and compose a growing proportion of the American population, this finding could have a significant negative effect on ED crowding. The first step toward addressing this issue is a better understanding of the nature of these visits. METHODS: We performed trend analysis for persons aged 65 years and older using 1993 to 2003 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data, an annual national sample of visits to the EDs of nonfederal general and short-stay hospitals. SAS 9.1 computed population estimates and standard errors for number of ED visits. Annual census data were used to compute visit rates per 100 persons. A least-squares test for trend determined slopes and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Visits for patients aged 65 to 74 years increased 34% during the study period. The visit rate for blacks increased 93% to 77 visits per 100 population, whereas the rate for whites increased 26% to 36 visits per 100. The admission rate did not change significantly during the study period. The number of visits at which 3 or more medications were prescribed increased 44%. The increased visits occurred primarily in the category of "other and undefined" diagnoses (90% increase). CONCLUSION: If these trends continue, ED visits in the United States for the 65- to 74-year-old group could nearly double from 6.4 million visits to 11.7 million visits by 2013.
Authors: João Carlos Pereira Gomes; Roger Daglius Dias; Jacson Venancio de Barros; Irineu Tadeu Velasco; Wilson Jacob Filho Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2020-06-11
Authors: Christopher R Carpenter; Elizabeth R Bassett; Grant M Fischer; Jonathan Shirshekan; James E Galvin; John C Morris Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Manish N Shah; Courtney M C Jones; Thomas M Richardson; Yeates Conwell; Paul Katz; Sandra M Schneider Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: A Litke; R Bossart; K Regez; U Schild; M Guglielmetti; A Conca; P Schäfer; B Reutlinger; B Mueller; W C Albrich Journal: Infection Date: 2013-02-24 Impact factor: 3.553
Authors: R Mitchell; B Draper; J Close; L Harvey; H Brodaty; V Do; T R Driscoll; J Braithwaite Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2019-07-24 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Laura P D'Arcy; Sally C Stearns; Marisa E Domino; Laura C Hanson; Morris Weinberger Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-12-18 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: S Gentile; O Lacroix; A C Durand; E Cretel; M Alazia; R Sambuc; S Bonin-Guillaume Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 4.075