Literature DB >> 18067568

Operational sex ratio and density do not affect directional selection on male sexual ornaments and behavior.

Megan L Head1, Anna K Lindholm, Robert Brooks.   

Abstract

Demographic parameters including operational sex ratio (OSR) and population density may influence the opportunity for, and strength of sexual selection. Traditionally, male-biased OSRs and high population densities have been thought to increase the opportunity for sexual selection on male sexual traits due to increased male competition for mates. Recent experimental evidence, however, suggests that male-biased OSRs might reduce the opportunity for sexual selection due to increased sexual coercion experienced by females. How OSR, density, and any resultant changes in the opportunity for sexual selection actually affect selection on male sexual traits is unclear. In this study, we independently manipulated OSR and density in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) without altering the number of males present. We recorded male and female behavior and used DNA microsatellite data to assign paternity to offspring and estimate male reproductive success. We then used linear selection analyses to examine the effects of OSR and density on directional sexual selection on male behavioral and morphological traits. We found that females were pursued more by males in male-biased treatments, despite no change in individual male behavior. There were no differences in sexual behavior experienced by females or performed by males in relation to density. Neither OSR nor density significantly altered the opportunity for sexual selection. Also, Although there was significant multivariate linear selection operating on males, neither OSR nor density altered the pattern of sexual selection on male traits. Our results suggest that differences in either OSR or density (independent of the number of males present) are unlikely to alter directional evolutionary change in male sexual traits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18067568     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00277.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

1.  Biased sex ratio and low population density increase male mating success in the bug Nysius huttoni (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae).

Authors:  Qiao Wang; Xiong Zhao He; Linghuan Yang; Duncan Hedderley; Lorraine K Davis
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-10-07

2.  Sexual conflict predicts morphology and behavior in two species of penduline tits.

Authors:  René E van Dijk; Akos Pogány; Jan Komdeur; Penn Lloyd; Tamás Székely
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.260

3.  Ontogenetic selection on hatchery salmon in the wild: natural selection on artificial phenotypes.

Authors:  Michael M Bailey; Kevin A Lachapelle; Michael T Kinnison
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 5.183

4.  Phenotypic selection on an ornamental trait is not modulated by breeding density in a pied flycatcher population.

Authors:  José Ignacio Morales-Mata; Jaime Potti; Carlos Camacho; Jesús Martínez-Padilla; David Canal
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.516

5.  The ecological-evolutionary interplay: density-dependent sexual selection in a migratory songbird.

Authors:  Thomas B Ryder; Robert C Fleischer; W Greg Shriver; Peter P Marra
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Predictors of male insemination success in the mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki).

Authors:  Megan L Head; Regina Vega-Trejo; Frances Jacomb; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Sperm storage by males causes changes in sperm phenotype and influences the reproductive fitness of males and their sons.

Authors:  Clelia Gasparini; Ryan Dosselli; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2017-05-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.