Literature DB >> 18067010

Fludarabine and treosulfan: a novel modified myeloablative regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation with effective antileukemia activity in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes.

Avichai Shimoni1, Izhar Hardan, Noga Shem-Tov, Avital Rand, Ronit Yerushalmi, Arnon Nagler.   

Abstract

Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) is potentially curative treatment for AML and MDS. New conditioning regimens are continuously explored trying to reduce toxicity while maintaining antileukemia effect. Treosulfan is an alkylating agent with in vitro cytotoxicity against leukemia as well as myeloablative and immunosuppressive properties when used in escalated doses. We explored a regimen of fludarabine (30 mg/m(2) x 5) and treosulfan (12 gr/m(2) x 3) in 24 patients, median age 55 years (range, 30-69), with AML (n = 19) or MDS (n = 5), not eligible for standard myeloablation. Donors were HLA-matched siblings (n = 11) or matched-unrelated (n = 13). Twenty-one patients engrafted within a median of 15 days. Extramedullary toxicity was relatively limited. The incidence of acute and chronic GVHD was 15% and 47%, respectively. With median follow-up of 19 months (range, 8 - 34), 16 patients are alive and 8 died (relapse-2, treatment-related-6). Two-year disease-free survival rate was 60% (95% CI, 39-81). The cumulative incidence of relapse was only 15% (95% CI, 5 - 44) while nonrelapse mortality rate was 25% (95% CI, 13-50). The fludarabine/treosulfan regimen can be considered a fully intensive, modified myeloablative regimen with effective antileukemia activity and acceptable toxicity in patients with AML/MDS not eligible for standard myeloablation, and merits further study in larger scale studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18067010     DOI: 10.1080/10428190701671051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma        ISSN: 1026-8022


  10 in total

1.  External validation and comparison of multiple prognostic scores in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Roni Shouval; Joshua A Fein; Aniela Shouval; Ivetta Danylesko; Noga Shem-Tov; Maya Zlotnik; Ronit Yerushalmi; Avichai Shimoni; Arnon Nagler
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-06-25

Review 2.  Conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Y S Jethava; S Sica; B Savani; F Socola; M Jagasia; M Mohty; A Nagler; A Bacigalupo
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 3.  Optimizing reduced-intensity conditioning regimens for myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Aravind Ramakrishnan; Brenda M Sandmaier
Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.929

4.  Reduced-toxicity conditioning with treosulfan and fludarabine in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndromes: final results of an international prospective phase II trial.

Authors:  Tapani Ruutu; Liisa Volin; Dietrich W Beelen; Rudolf Trenschel; Juergen Finke; Marc Schnitzler; Jerzy Holowiecki; Sebastian Giebel; Miroslaw Markiewicz; Lutz Uharek; Igor W Blau; Joachim Kienast; Matthias Stelljes; Kajsa Larsson; Axel R Zander; Martin Gramatzki; Roland Repp; Hermann Einsele; Gernot Stuhler; Joachim Baumgart; Heidrun A Mylius; Uwe Pichlmeier; Mathias Freund; Jochen Casper
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Dose intensity for conditioning in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: can we recommend "when and for whom" in 2021?

Authors:  Nico Gagelmann; Nicolaus Kröger
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Long-term outcomes in patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies following matched related donor hematopoietic cell transplantation with myeloablative conditioning of BU, etoposide and CY.

Authors:  S Naik; R Wong; S Arai; J Brown; G Laport; R Lowsky; D Miklos; J Shizuru; K Blume; R Negrin; L Johnston
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Comparative study of treosulfan plus Fludarabine (FT14) with busulfan plus Fludarabine (FB4) for acute myeloid leukemia in first or second complete remission: An analysis from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP).

Authors:  Eleni Gavriilaki; Myriam Labopin; Ioanna Sakellari; Urpu Salmenniemi; Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha; Victoria Potter; Ana Berceanu; Alessandro Rambaldi; Inken Hilgendorf; Nicolaus Kröger; Stephan Mielke; Tsila Zuckerman; Jaime Sanz; Alessandro Busca; Hakan Ozdogu; Achilles Anagnostopoulos; Bipin Savani; Sebastian Giebel; Ali Bazarbachi; Alexandros Spyridonidis; Arnon Nagler; Mohamad Mohty
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 5.174

8.  Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Treosulfan in Patients With Thalassemia Major Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Ezhilpavai Mohanan; John C Panetta; Kavitha M Lakshmi; Eunice S Edison; Anu Korula; Fouzia Na; Aby Abraham; Auro Viswabandya; Biju George; Vikram Mathews; Alok Srivastava; Poonkuzhali Balasubramanian
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Long-Term Outcomes of Treosulfan- vs. Busulfan-Based Conditioning Regimen for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Before Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sheng Zhu; Gang Liu; Jing Liu; Qiuying Chen; Zhiqiang Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Conditioning with fludarabine and treosulfan compared to FLAMSA-RIC in allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myeloid malignancies: a retrospective single-center analysis.

Authors:  Peter Herhaus; Mareike Verbeek; Krischan Braitsch; Alix Schwarz; Katrin Koch; Mara Hubbuch; Helge Menzel; Ulrich Keller; Katharina S Götze; Florian Bassermann
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.030

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.