Literature DB >> 18066957

Women's views of their experiences in the CHIPS (Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy Study) Pilot Trial.

L A Magee1, P von Dadelszen, S Chan, A Gafni, A Gruslin, M Helewa, S Hewson, E Kavuma, S K Lee, A G Logan, D McKay, J-M Moutquin, A Ohlsson, E Rey, S Ross, J Singer, A R Willan, M E Hannah, For The Chips Pilot Trial Collaborative Group.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Satisfaction with maternity care is strongly related to the patient-caregiver relationship and involvement in the decision-making process. We sought to compare women's views about their care in a randomized trial of 'less tight' vs. 'tight' control of non-proteinuric pre-existing or gestational hypertension in pregnancy.
METHODS: In the CHIPS Pilot Trial, women completed a postpartum questionnaire to assess their likes and dislikes about their blood pressure (BP) management and trial participation. Comparisons were descriptive.
RESULTS: Baseline information was similar for the 'less tight' and 'tight' control groups. Of 132 women, 126 (95.5%) from 17 centers completed a postpartum questionnaire, usually within days of delivery. At least 90% of women in both groups were satisfied with their care, and would be willing to participate again or recommend participation to a friend. Women in both the 'less tight' and 'tight' groups were satisfied with BP management (98.4% vs. 95.1%), and the frequency of tests of maternal and fetal well being. Half of women in both groups perceived that their BP was too high and that caregivers thought that their BP was too high. More women in the 'less tight' (vs. the 'tight') control group took less medication than expected (71.7% vs. 38.2%). More women in the 'tight' (vs. the 'less tight') group took more medication than they expected (60.0% vs. 22.2%). At least 60% of all women used home BP monitoring.
CONCLUSION: In the CHIPS Pilot Trial, while women stated that they were satisfied with their BP management and care, a surprising 50% in both groups thought that their BP was too high. The majority of women used home BP monitoring, the role of which must be further defined in hypertensive pregnancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18066957     DOI: 10.1080/10641950701547549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Pregnancy        ISSN: 1064-1955            Impact factor:   2.108


  9 in total

1.  Telehealth with remote blood pressure monitoring for postpartum hypertension: A prospective single-cohort feasibility study.

Authors:  Kara K Hoppe; Makeba Williams; Nicole Thomas; Julia B Zella; Anna Drewry; KyungMann Kim; Thomas Havighurst; Heather M Johnson
Journal:  Pregnancy Hypertens       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 2.899

2.  Blood pressure self-monitoring in pregnancy: examining feasibility in a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Katherine L Tucker; Kathryn S Taylor; Carole Crawford; James A Hodgkinson; Clare Bankhead; Tricia Carver; Elizabeth Ewers; Margaret Glogowska; Sheila M Greenfield; Lucy Ingram; Lisa Hinton; Khalid S Khan; Louise Locock; Lucy Mackillop; Christine McCourt; Alexander M Pirie; Richard Stevens; Richard J McManus
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Exploring the potential for introducing home monitoring of blood pressure during pregnancy into maternity care: current views and experiences of staff-a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lisa Hinton; James Hodgkinson; Katherine L Tucker; Linda Rozmovits; Lucy Chappell; Sheila Greenfield; Christine McCourt; Jane Sandall; Richard J McManus
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Pregnant women's experiences with the management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Amyna Helou; Kay Stewart; Kath Ryan; Johnson George
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 5.  Recommendations for home blood pressure monitoring in Latin American countries: A Latin American Society of Hypertension position paper.

Authors:  Raúl Villar; Ramiro A Sánchez; José Boggia; Ernesto Peñaherrera; Jesús Lopez; Weimar Sebba Barroso; Eduardo Barbosa; Leonardo Cobos; Rafael Hernández Hernández; José Andrés Octavio; José Z Parra Carrillo; Agustín J Ramírez; Gianfranco Parati
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Home blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karen Tran; Raj Padwal; Nadia Khan; Mary-Doug Wright; Wee Shian Chan
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2021-06-15

7.  Implementing self-management: a mixed methods study of women's experiences of a postpartum hypertension intervention (SNAP-HT).

Authors:  Alexandra E Cairns; Katherine L Tucker; Carole Crawford; Richard J McManus; John Powell
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  User Experiences With and Recommendations for Mobile Health Technology for Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Karin Rolanda Jongsma; Josephus F M van den Heuvel; Jasmijn Rake; Annelien L Bredenoord; Mireille N Bekker
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 4.773

9.  How Do Home and Clinic Blood Pressure Readings Compare in Pregnancy?

Authors:  Katherine L Tucker; Clare Bankhead; James Hodgkinson; Nia Roberts; Richard Stevens; Carl Heneghan; Évelyne Rey; Chern Lo; Manju Chandiramani; Rennae S Taylor; Robyn A North; Asma Khalil; Kathryn Marko; Jason Waugh; Mark Brown; Carole Crawford; Kathryn S Taylor; Lucy Mackillop; Richard J McManus
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 10.190

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.