Literature DB >> 18066743

Improved quantitative assessment of left ventricular volumes using TGrE approach after application of extracellular contrast agent at 3 Tesla.

Ashraf Hamdan1, Sebastian Kelle, Bernhard Schnackenburg, Eckart Fleck, Eike Nagel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine whether the use of an extracellular contrast agent could improve the image quality of TGrE sequence for evaluation of left ventricular (LV) volumes and function, using a 3.0 T cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) system.
METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients underwent CMR imaging at 3.0 T. In each patient, 3 long axis views and multiple short axis slices with complete coverage of the left ventricle were performed using turbo gradient echo (TGrE) sequence before and after application of contrast agent 0.15 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine. LV volumes and ejection fractions were calculated using Simpson's rule and Area-Length-Method. For comparison of native and postcontrast TGrE, image quality, blood-to-myocardium contrast, and cardiac function parameters were assessed.
RESULTS: Application of contrast agent improves the image quality and blood-to-myocardium contrast in long-axis views. In short axis views, however, administration of contrast agent decrease the image quality and blood-to-myocardium contrast. After application of contrast agent in long axis scans, end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were significantly larger (+ 12.9 mL [9%], p < 0.02; + 16.9 mL [17%], p < 0.004 respectively), and LV ejection fraction borderline lower (-4.1% [7%], p = 0.08). In short axis scans, however, end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were significantly smaller (-14.8 mL [13%], p < 0.001; -17.6 mL [21%], p < 0.004 respectively), and LV ejection fraction borderline higher (3% [6%], p = 0.052).
CONCLUSION: The use of an extracellular contrast agent improves the image quality for the assessment of LV volumes at 3.0 Tesla for TGrE sequence in long axis but not in short axis views.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18066743     DOI: 10.1080/10976640701693600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson        ISSN: 1097-6647            Impact factor:   5.364


  9 in total

1.  Functional cardiac MR imaging with true fast imaging with steady-state free precession before and after intravenous injection of contrast medium: comparison of image quality and accuracy.

Authors:  Gabriele A Krombach; Thorsten Plum; Ralf Koos; Rainer Hoffmann; Ertunc Altiok; Nils A Krämer; Rolf W Günther; Felix Schoth
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-10-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Dobutamine stress tagging and gradient-echo imaging for detection of coronary heart disease at 3 T.

Authors:  D Thomas; C Meyer; K Strach; C P Naehle; J Mazraeh; T Gampert; H H Schild; T Sommer
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Clinical applications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 3 tesla.

Authors:  Allison G Hays; Michael Schär; Sebastian Kelle
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-08

Review 4.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3.0 T: current state of the art.

Authors:  John N Oshinski; Jana G Delfino; Puneet Sharma; Ahmed M Gharib; Roderic I Pettigrew
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 5.  Guidelines for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging-Part 2: Interpretation of Cine, Flow, and Angiography Data.

Authors:  Jae Wook Lee; Jee Hye Hur; Dong Hyun Yang; Bae Young Lee; Dong Jin Im; Su Jin Hong; Eun Young Kim; Eun Ah Park; Yeseul Jo; JeongJae Kim; Chul Hwan Park; Hwan Seok Yong
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 6.  Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update : Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR): Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post-Processing.

Authors:  Jeanette Schulz-Menger; David A Bluemke; Jens Bremerich; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Raymond J Kim; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Christopher M Kramer; Dudley J Pennell; Sven Plein; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post processing.

Authors:  Jeanette Schulz-Menger; David A Bluemke; Jens Bremerich; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Raymond J Kim; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Christopher M Kramer; Dudley J Pennell; Sven Plein; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  S Kelle; A Hamdan; B Schnackenburg; U Köhler; C Klein; E Nagel; E Fleck
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Left Ventricular Function Evaluation on a 3T MR Scanner with Parallel RF Transmission Technique: Prospective Comparison of Cine Sequences Acquired before and after Gadolinium Injection.

Authors:  Thibault Caspar; Anthony Schultz; Mickaël Schaeffer; Aïssam Labani; Mi-Young Jeung; Paul Thomas Jurgens; Soraya El Ghannudi; Catherine Roy; Mickaël Ohana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.