Literature DB >> 18066360

Formative evaluation using checklists to improve research proposals.

Lynnda J Emery1, Carolyn Harvey, Catherine M Andersen.   

Abstract

Developing research proposals that protect human participants and understanding the institutional review board (IRB) approval process require high-level application of many skills. The purpose of this article is to describe how faculty can use formative evaluation techniques and checklists to guide students to build skills in writing research proposals for studies that involve human participants or their data. Formative evaluation, the process of critically reviewing work to improve it, is emphasized, and checklists that summarize IRB criteria and standards and present the critical content of research proposals for studies involving human participants are provided. Teaching principles that can guide faculty in using the checklists to give feedback and help students develop high-quality research proposals are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical research; Compliance; Confidentiality; Health information management; Human participant protection; IRB checklist; Institutional review board; Privacy

Year:  2006        PMID: 18066360      PMCID: PMC2047304     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag        ISSN: 1559-4122


  3 in total

1.  American Health Information Management Association Code of Ethics. Revised and approved July 2004.

Authors: 
Journal:  J AHIMA       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

2.  Institutional review boards: changing with the times?

Authors:  G L Chadwick; C M Dunn
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2000-11

3.  Protection of human subjects with disability: guidelines for research.

Authors:  M G Stineman; D W Musick
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.966

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.