Literature DB >> 18065732

Nonrandomized comparison of primary chemotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage IIA and IIB nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer.

Andrew J Stephenson1, George J Bosl, Robert J Motzer, Dean F Bajorin, Jason P Stasi, Joel Sheinfeld.   

Abstract

PURPOSE Patients with clinical stage (CS) IIA and IIB nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) with adenopathy more than 2 cm, multiple masses, elevated serum tumor markers, or disease outside the primary landing zone have increasingly been recommended to receive primary chemotherapy over time at our institution. The impact of these selection factors on the outcome of patients managed primarily by retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) or chemotherapy was examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1989 and 2002, 252 patients with CS IIA and IIB NSGCT were referred to our institution for initial management, of whom 136 underwent RPLND and 116 received chemotherapy and postchemotherapy RPLND. Patient information was obtained from a prospective RPLND database. Results Proportionately more patients received chemotherapy over time (22% in 1989 to 1993 v 68% in 1999 to 2002), and the relapse-free survival (RFS) subsequently improved from 84% (1989 to 1998) to 98% (1999 to 2002; P = .004) without increasing the proportion who received any chemotherapy (70% v 79%; P = .16). By increasingly selecting patients with adverse features for primary chemotherapy, the RFS after RPLND improved from 78% to 100% (P = .019), but rates of pathologic stage II and retroperitoneal teratoma were unaffected. Retroperitoneal histology and RFS did not change over time for chemotherapy patients. Primary chemotherapy was associated with improved RFS compared with RPLND (98% v 79%; P < .001), but disease-specific survival did not differ significantly (100% v 98%; P = .3). CONCLUSION Patient selection factors have significantly improved the outcome of patients with CS IIA and IIB NSGCT without substantially increasing the proportion of patients exposed to chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18065732     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.0808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  21 in total

1.  Canadian consensus guidelines for the management of testicular germ cell cancer.

Authors:  Lori Wood; Christian Kollmannsberger; Michael Jewett; Peter Chung; Sebastian Hotte; Martin O'Malley; Joan Sweet; Lynn Anson-Cartwright; Eric Winquist; Scott North; Scott Tyldesley; Jeremy Sturgeon; Mary Gospodarowicz; Roanne Segal; Tina Cheng; Peter Venner; Malcolm Moore; Peter Albers; Robert Huddart; Craig Nichols; Padraig Warde
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: an update in testicular malignancies.

Authors:  K Yadav
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Current controversies on the role of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for testicular cancer.

Authors:  Roy Mano; Renzo Di Natale; Joel Sheinfeld
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients Treated for Testis Cancer: The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Experience.

Authors:  Shaheen R Alanee; Brett S Carver; Darren R Feldman; Robert J Motzer; George J Bosl; Joel Sheinfeld
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  Systemic therapy for primary and extragonadal germ cell tumors: prognosis and nuances of treatment.

Authors:  Bilal A Siddiqui; Miao Zhang; Louis L Pisters; Shi-Ming Tu
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-01

Review 6.  Current management and management controversies in early- and intermediate-stage of nonseminoma germ cell tumors.

Authors:  Salim K Cheriyan; Marilin Nicholson; Ahmet M Aydin; Mounsif Azizi; Charles C Peyton; Wade J Sexton; Scott M Gilbert
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-01

Review 7.  Good-risk-advanced germ cell tumors: historical perspective and current standards of care.

Authors:  Darren R Feldman; Robert J Motzer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Management of good-risk metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis: current concepts and controversies.

Authors:  Gautam Jayram; Russell Z Szmulewitz; Scott E Eggener
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

9.  Clinical outcomes in patients with stage I non-seminomatous germ cell cancer.

Authors:  Zhao-Jie Lv; Song Wu; Pei Dong; Kai Yao; Yin-Yin He; Yao-Ting Gui; Fang-Jian Zhou; Zhuo-Wei Liu; Zhi-Ming Cai
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 10.  Late relapse of germ cell tumors.

Authors:  Jan Oldenburg; Rolf Wahlqvist; Sophie D Fosså
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.