Literature DB >> 18065676

Differential clustering of bowel biopsy-associated bacterial profiles of specimens collected in Mexico and Canada: what do these profiles represent?

Rodrigo Bibiloni1, Puneeta Tandon2, Florencia Vargas-Voracka3, Raphael Barreto-Zuniga3, Andres Lupian-Sanchez3, Miguel Angel Rico-Hinojosa3, Jennifer Guban1, Richard Fedorak2, Gerald W Tannock4,1.   

Abstract

Bowel commensals appear to be an important source of antigens that drive the chronic immune inflammation characteristic of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis [inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD)]. Biopsy-associated bacteria are assumed to be particularly relevant in bacteriological investigations of IBD because they are assumed to be located on the mucosal surface and hence close to immunological cells. This investigation analysed the bacterial collections associated with bowel biopsies, aspirates of residual fluid after bowel cleansing and faeces from IBD patients and non-IBD subjects in Edmonton, Canada, and Mexico City, Mexico. Temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis of 16S rRNA gene sequences produced profiles of the bacterial collections and their similarities were compared. Similarity analysis showed that the profiles did not cluster according to disease status, but that Canadian and Mexican profiles could be differentiated by this method. Comparison of biopsy, aspirate and faecal samples obtained from the same subject showed that, on average, the profiles were highly similar. Therefore, biopsy-associated bacteria are likely to represent, at least in part, contaminants from the fluid, which resembles a faecal solution, that pools in the bowel after cleansing prior to endoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18065676     DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.47321-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  10 in total

1.  Assessing gut microbial diversity from feces and rectal mucosa.

Authors:  Ana Durbán; Juan J Abellán; Nuria Jiménez-Hernández; Marta Ponce; Julio Ponce; Teresa Sala; Giuseppe D'Auria; Amparo Latorre; Andrés Moya
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 2.  Probiotics, enteric and diarrheal diseases, and global health.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Preidis; Colin Hill; Richard L Guerrant; B S Ramakrishna; Gerald W Tannock; James Versalovic
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  PCR detection and identification of bacterial contaminants in ocular samples from post-operative endophthalmitis.

Authors:  Majid Abrishami; Behnam Hashemi; Mojtaba Abrishami; Khalil Abnous; Kamal Razavi-Azarkhiavi; Javad Behravan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-04-01

4.  Changes in bowel microbiota induced by feeding weanlings resistant starch stimulate transcriptomic and physiological responses.

Authors:  Wayne Young; Nicole C Roy; Julian Lee; Blair Lawley; Don Otter; Gemma Henderson; Mark J McCann; Gerald W Tannock
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  The bowel microbiota and inflammatory bowel diseases.

Authors:  Gerald W Tannock
Journal:  Int J Inflam       Date:  2010-08-05

6.  The Effects of Bowel Preparation on Microbiota-Related Metrics Differ in Health and in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and for the Mucosal and Luminal Microbiota Compartments.

Authors:  Rima M Shobar; Suresh Velineni; Ali Keshavarzian; Garth Swanson; Mark T DeMeo; Joshua E Melson; John Losurdo; Philip A Engen; Yan Sun; Lars Koenig; Ece A Mutlu
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.488

7.  Extending colonic mucosal microbiome analysis-assessment of colonic lavage as a proxy for endoscopic colonic biopsies.

Authors:  Euan Watt; Matthew R Gemmell; Susan Berry; Mark Glaire; Freda Farquharson; Petra Louis; Graeme I Murray; Emad El-Omar; Georgina L Hold
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 14.650

8.  Gut bacterial profile in patients newly diagnosed with treatment-naïve Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Petr Ricanek; Sheba M Lothe; Stephan A Frye; Andreas Rydning; Morten H Vatn; Tone Tønjum
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-24

9.  Can Colonoscopy Aspirates be a Substitute for Fecal Samples in Analyses of the Intestinal Microbiota?

Authors:  Nirit Keren; Timna Naftali; Amir Kovacs; Fred M Konikoff; Uri Gophna
Journal:  Biosci Microbiota Food Health       Date:  2012-07-26

10.  Fecal microbial dysbiosis in Chinese patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Hai-Qin Ma; Ting-Ting Yu; Xiao-Jing Zhao; Yi Zhang; Hong-Jie Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.