Literature DB >> 18064708

Sensory gating in the human hippocampal and rhinal regions: regional differences.

N N Boutros1, R Mears, M E Pflieger, K A Moxon, E Ludowig, T Rosburg.   

Abstract

To further explore the roles of medial temporal structures in mediating sensory gating of incoming irrelevant or redundant auditory input, twenty-seven patients with intractable epilepsy with depth electrodes implanted in the medial temporal lobe for presurgery evaluation underwent evoked response recording to auditory paired-stimuli (S1-S2). Seventeen subjects were diagnosed with left medial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) and 10 with right MTLE. Only data from the nonlesion side were included. Twenty-three records from rhinal and anterior hippocampal regions, and 21 from posterior hippocampal regions were included in the analysis. The rhinal region had two prominent components (a negativity peaking around 200 ms followed by a positivity peaking around 400 ms). Both the anterior and posterior hippocampal regions exhibited a dominant negative potential peaking around 400 ms. These components were all composed predominantly of slower frequencies. In contrast, a negativity in the posterior hippocampus at around 100 ms was composed of slow and fast frequencies. All components but the early rhinal negativity were attenuated by stimulus repetition. This is the first report documenting that different regions of the medial temporal area are differentially involved in the processing of auditory input, most likely reflecting separate steps of processing. The data support the need for further exploration of the contribution of these regions to sensory gating. This information helps to increase our understanding of this basic but important and complex function. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18064708     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  28 in total

1.  Mapping repetition suppression of the N100 evoked response to the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Nash N Boutros; Klevest Gjini; Horst Urbach; Mark E Pflieger
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Hearing without listening: functional connectivity reveals the engagement of multiple nonauditory networks during basic sound processing.

Authors:  Dave R M Langers; Jennifer R Melcher
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2011

3.  Distinct neural generators of sensory gating in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Terrance J Williams; Keith H Nuechterlein; Kenneth L Subotnik; Cindy M Yee
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  The neural networks underlying auditory sensory gating.

Authors:  A R Mayer; F M Hanlon; A R Franco; T M Teshiba; R J Thoma; V P Clark; J M Canive
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Phantom percepts: tinnitus and pain as persisting aversive memory networks.

Authors:  Dirk De Ridder; Ana Belen Elgoyhen; Ranulfo Romo; Berthold Langguth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Attention modulates topology and dynamics of auditory sensory gating.

Authors:  Sanja Josef Golubic; Miljenka Jelena Jurasic; Ana Susac; Ralph Huonker; Theresa Gotz; Jens Haueisen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Mapping repetition suppression of the P50 evoked response to the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Nash N Boutros; Klevest Gjini; Simon B Eickhoff; Horst Urbach; Mark E Pflieger
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-04       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  GABA(B) receptor blockade in the hippocampus affects sensory and sensorimotor gating in Long-Evans rats.

Authors:  Jingyi Ma; L Stan Leung
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Increased hippocampal, thalamic, and prefrontal hemodynamic response to an urban noise stimulus in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jason R Tregellas; Jamey Ellis; Shireen Shatti; Yiping P Du; Donald C Rojas
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  The differences in brain activity between narrow band noise and pure tone tinnitus.

Authors:  Sven Vanneste; Mark Plazier; Elsa van der Loo; Paul Van de Heyning; Dirk De Ridder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.