Literature DB >> 18064647

Ploidy and karyotype complexity are powerful prognostic indicators in the Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors: a study by the United Kingdom Cancer Cytogenetics and the Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group.

Paul Roberts1, Susan A Burchill, Samantha Brownhill, Catherine J Cullinane, Colin Johnston, Mike J Griffiths, Dom J McMullan, Nick P Bown, Stephen P Morris, Ian J Lewis.   

Abstract

Ewing's sarcoma family tumors (ESFT) are characterized by the presence of EWSR1-ETS fusion genes. Secondary chromosome changes are frequently described, although their clinical significance is not clear. In this study, we have collected and reviewed abnormal karyotypes from 88 patients with primary ESFT and a rearrangement of 22q12. Secondary changes were identified in 80% (70/88) of tumors at diagnosis. Multivariate analysis showed a worse overall and relapse free survival (RFS) for those with a complex karyotype (overall survival, P = 0.005; RFS, P = 0.04), independent of metastatic disease. Univariate survival analysis showed that a chromosome number above 50 or a complex karyotype was associated with a worse overall survival (>50 chromosomes, P = 0.05; complex karyotype, P = 0.04). There was no association between type of cytogenetic abnormality and the presence of metastatic disease at diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate survival analysis of a small subgroup with trisomy 20 indicated that trisomy 20 was associated with a worse overall and RFS. There was no difference in outcome associated with other recurrent trisomies (2, 5, 7, 8, or 12) or the common recurrent secondary structural rearrangements (deletions of 1p36, 9p12, 17p13, and 16q, and gain of 1q), although numbers were small. These data demonstrate the continued value of cytogenetics as a genome-wide screen in ESFT and illustrates the potential importance of secondary chromosome changes for stratification of patients for risk. Specifically, karyotype complexity appears to be a powerful predictor of prognosis, and the presence of trisomy 20 may be a marker of a more aggressive subset of this group. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18064647     DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  18 in total

1.  Integrated molecular genetic profiling of pediatric high-grade gliomas reveals key differences with the adult disease.

Authors:  Barbara S Paugh; Chunxu Qu; Chris Jones; Zhaoli Liu; Martyna Adamowicz-Brice; Junyuan Zhang; Dorine A Bax; Beth Coyle; Jennifer Barrow; Darren Hargrave; James Lowe; Amar Gajjar; Wei Zhao; Alberto Broniscer; David W Ellison; Richard G Grundy; Suzanne J Baker
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Ewing sarcoma/peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor and related tumors.

Authors:  Maria Tsokos; Rita D Alaggio; Louis P Dehner; Paul S Dickman
Journal:  Pediatr Dev Pathol       Date:  2012

3.  Molecular cytogenetic characterization of two established ESFT cell lines.

Authors:  Masako Ishiguro; Mutsumi Yuki; Tomoko Fukushige; Mikio Mizoguchi; Yasuhiko Kaneko; Takeshita Morishige; Hiroshi Iwasaki
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 4.174

4.  Targeted next-generation sequencing of CIC-DUX4 soft tissue sarcomas demonstrates low mutational burden and recurrent chromosome 1p loss.

Authors:  Lorena Lazo de la Vega; Daniel H Hovelson; Andi K Cani; Chia-Jen Liu; Jonathan B McHugh; David R Lucas; Dafydd G Thomas; Rajiv M Patel; Scott A Tomlins
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 5.  Recent advances in the molecular pathogenesis of Ewing's sarcoma.

Authors:  E C Toomey; J D Schiffman; S L Lessnick
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Downstream EWS/FLI1 - upstream Ewing's sarcoma.

Authors:  Heinrich Kovar
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 11.117

7.  Explant culture of sarcoma patients' tissue.

Authors:  Roman Muff; Sander M Botter; Knut Husmann; Joelle Tchinda; Philomina Selvam; Franziska Seeli-Maduz; Bruno Fuchs
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 5.662

8.  Rearrangement bursts generate canonical gene fusions in bone and soft tissue tumors.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Anderson; Richard de Borja; Matthew D Young; Fabio Fuligni; Andrej Rosic; Nicola D Roberts; Simon Hajjar; Mehdi Layeghifard; Ana Novokmet; Paul E Kowalski; Matthew Anaka; Scott Davidson; Mehdi Zarrei; Badr Id Said; L Christine Schreiner; Remi Marchand; Joseph Sitter; Nalan Gokgoz; Ledia Brunga; Garrett T Graham; Anthony Fullam; Nischalan Pillay; Jeffrey A Toretsky; Akihiko Yoshida; Tatsuhiro Shibata; Markus Metzler; Gino R Somers; Stephen W Scherer; Adrienne M Flanagan; Peter J Campbell; Joshua D Schiffman; Mary Shago; Ludmil B Alexandrov; Jay S Wunder; Irene L Andrulis; David Malkin; Sam Behjati; Adam Shlien
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Ewing sarcoma fusion protein EWSR1/FLI1 interacts with EWSR1 leading to mitotic defects in zebrafish embryos and human cell lines.

Authors:  Lisa J Embree; Mizuki Azuma; Dennis D Hickstein
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  Review: Ewing Sarcoma Predisposition.

Authors:  Pablo Gargallo; Yania Yáñez; Antonio Juan; Vanessa Segura; Julia Balaguer; Bárbara Torres; Silves Oltra; Victoria Castel; Adela Cañete
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 3.201

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.