Literature DB >> 18064438

Pharmacological analysis of the interaction of antimuscarinic drugs at M(2) and M(3) muscarinic receptors in vivo using the pithed rat assay.

Scott R Armstrong1, Sergio Briones, Brian Horger, Carrie L Richardson, Sarah Jaw-Tsai, Sharath S Hegde.   

Abstract

Muscarinic receptor antagonists form the mainstay of the therapeutic options for airway, bladder, and gastrointestinal smooth muscle disorders. Both M(2) and M(3) muscarinic receptors are involved in mediating smooth muscle contractility, although the relative functional contribution of each subtype, especially in the disease state, is unclear. Because the potency and selectivity of compounds for a given receptor in an in vivo setting can be dissimilar to that observed in an in vitro system, we developed an in vivo assay to simultaneously determine the absolute potency and selectivity of muscarinic receptor antagonists at M(2) and M(3) receptors using the pithed rat. Methacholine (MCh)-induced bradycardia and depressor responses were used as surrogate functional endpoints for M(2) and M(3) receptor activation, respectively. The influence of the muscarinic antagonists, tolterodine, oxybutynin, darifenacin, Ro 320-6206, solifenacin, or tiotropium on the MCh-induced responses were studied. The estimated DR(10) values (dose producing a tenfold shift in the MCh curve) of tolterodine, oxybutynin, darifenacin, Ro 320-6206, solifenacin, and tiotropium for the M(2) muscarinic receptor-mediated bradycardia were 0.22, 1.18, approximately 2.6, 0.025, 0.40, and 0.0026 mg/kg, respectively, and 0.14, 0.18, 0.11, 3.0, 0.18, and 0.0017 mg/kg, respectively, for the M(3) muscarinic receptor-mediated depressor response. In a separate set of experiments, a single intravenous dose of tiotropium was administered before a MCh curve at 1, 3, 6, or 9 h to determine if tiotropium exhibited time-dependent selectivity for the M(3) receptor as has been reported from in vitro studies. The results indicate a slight preference of tiotropium for the M(3) receptor at later time points. The pithed rat assay may serve useful for elucidating the functional contribution of M(2) and M(3) receptors to the in vivo pharmacological effects of antagonists in disease animal models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18064438     DOI: 10.1007/s00210-007-0224-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol        ISSN: 0028-1298            Impact factor:   3.000


  33 in total

Review 1.  Muscarinic receptor ligands and their therapeutic potential.

Authors:  R M Eglen; A Choppin; M P Dillon; S Hegde
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 2.  Contractile role of M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors in gastrointestinal, airway and urinary bladder smooth muscle.

Authors:  Frederick J Ehlert
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 5.037

Review 3.  Diversity of structure, signaling and regulation within the family of muscarinic cholinergic receptors.

Authors:  M M Hosey
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1992-02-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  International Union of Pharmacology. XVII. Classification of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  M P Caulfield; N J Birdsall
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 5.  Evidence for the efficacy and safety of tolterodine in the treatment of overactive bladder.

Authors:  P Abrams
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.889

Review 6.  Subtypes of the muscarinic receptor in smooth muscle.

Authors:  F J Ehlert; R S Ostrom; G W Sawyer
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.037

7.  Methoctramine selectively blocks cardiac muscarinic M2 receptors in vivo.

Authors:  J Wess; P Angeli; C Melchiorre; U Moser; E Mutschler; G Lambrecht
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  Functional role of M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors in the urinary bladder of rats in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  S S Hegde; A Choppin; D Bonhaus; S Briaud; M Loeb; T M Moy; D Loury; R M Eglen
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 9.  Muscarinic antagonists in development for disorders of smooth muscle function.

Authors:  R M Wallis; C M Napier
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.037

Review 10.  Antimuscarinics for the treatment of overactive bladder: current options and emerging therapies.

Authors:  Sharath S Hegde; Mathai Mammen; Jeffrey R Jasper
Journal:  Curr Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2004-01
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Similarities and differences in the autonomic control of airway and urinary bladder smooth muscle.

Authors:  Martin C Michel; Sergio Parra
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 3.000

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.