Literature DB >> 18063456

Risk factors for a bad split during sagittal split osteotomy.

Marcus Stephan Kriwalsky1, Peter Maurer2, Rafael Block Veras2, Alexander Walter Eckert2, Johannes Schubert2.   

Abstract

One of the operative complications during sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) in orthognatic surgery is a bad split, meaning an undesired fracture of the mandible during osteotomy. The aim of this study was to find out if there is a relation between the occurrence of bad splits during SSO and the presence of third molars, the patient's age, or the surgeon's experience. Clinical notes of 110 consecutive patients who had had a total of 220 SSOs using the Obwegeser/Dal Pont technique were evaluated and divided into three groups: 1 missing third molar (n=168); 2 retained or impacted third molar that was removed during the SSO (n=23); and 3 third molar left in place during SSO (n=29). There were a total of 12 (6%) bad splits. 9 (5%) in group 1, two (9%) in group 2, and one (3%) in group 3. There were no significant differences between groups 1-3, in particular the surgeon's qualification had no influence on the incidence. Older patients seemed more at risk of a bad split than younger ones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18063456     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2007.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  9 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors and prevention of bad splits during sagittal split osteotomy.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic; Belini Freire-Maia
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-08-12

2.  CAD/CAM Engineered Patient-Specific Impants as a Reposition Device in Le Fort I and Modified Subcondylar Osteotomies: Case Report of Facial Deformity Correction in Acromegaly.

Authors:  Juho Suojanen; Zlatan Hodzic; Tuula Palotie; Patricia Stoor
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-07-06

3.  Morphometrical analysis of the human mandibular canal: a CT investigation.

Authors:  Marcello Rodrigues de Oliveira Júnior; André Luis Santos Saud; Debora Rodrigues Fonseca; Bernardo De-Ary-Pires; Mário Ary Pires-Neto; Ricardo de Ary-Pires
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Complications after orthognathic surgery: our experience on 423 cases.

Authors:  Marco Friscia; Carolina Sbordone; Marzia Petrocelli; Luigi Angelo Vaira; Federica Attanasi; Francesco Maria Cassandro; Mariano Paternoster; Giorgio Iaconetta; Luigi Califano
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-03-02

5.  Correlation between mandibular anatomy and bad split occurrence during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a three-dimensional study.

Authors:  Wael Telha; Bassam Abotaleb; Jie Zhang; Rui Bi; Songsong Zhu; Nan Jiang
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  Effect of perioperative buccal fracture of the proximal segment on postoperative stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Sang-Yoon Lee; Hoon Joo Yang; Jeong-Joon Han; Soon Jung Hwang
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-10-22

7.  Impacted third molars in sagittal split osteotomies in mandibular prognathism and micrognathia.

Authors:  S M Balaji
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01

Review 8.  The modifications of the sagittal ramus split osteotomy: a literature review.

Authors:  Roland Böckmann; Joeri Meyns; Eric Dik; Peter Kessler
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-01-08

9.  Dal Pont vs Hunsuck: Which Technique Can Lead to a Lower Incidence of Bad Split during Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy? A Triple-blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Farhad Zeynalzadeh; Zahra Shooshtari; Majid Eshghpour; Seied Hosein Hoseini Zarch; Elahe Tohidi; Sahand Samieirad
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2021-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.