Literature DB >> 18063405

How actions create--not just reveal--preferences.

Dan Ariely1, Michael I Norton.   

Abstract

The neo-classical economics view that behavior is driven by - and reflective of - hedonic utility is challenged by psychologists' demonstrations of cases in which actions do not merely reveal preferences but rather create them. In this view, preferences are frequently constructed in the moment and are susceptible to fleeting situational factors; problematically, individuals are insensitive to the impact of such factors on their behavior, misattributing utility caused by these irrelevant factors to stable underlying preferences. Consequently, subsequent behavior might reflect not hedonic utility but rather this erroneously imputed utility that lingers in memory. Here we review the roles of these streams of utility in shaping preferences, and discuss how neuroimaging offers unique possibilities for disentangling their independent contributions to behavior.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18063405     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  36 in total

1.  Neural correlates of cognitive dissonance and choice-induced preference change.

Authors:  Keise Izuma; Madoka Matsumoto; Kou Murayama; Kazuyuki Samejima; Norihiro Sadato; Kenji Matsumoto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Human behaviour: Shoppers like what they know.

Authors:  Peter M Todd
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Maintaining trust when agents can engage in self-deception.

Authors:  Andrés Babino; Hernán A Makse; Rafael DiTella; Mariano Sigman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Moving beyond panaceas in fisheries governance.

Authors:  Oran R Young; D G Webster; Michael E Cox; Jesper Raakjær; Lau Øfjord Blaxekjær; Níels Einarsson; Ross A Virginia; James Acheson; Daniel Bromley; Emma Cardwell; Courtney Carothers; Einar Eythórsson; Richard B Howarth; Svein Jentoft; Bonnie J McCay; Fiona McCormack; Gail Osherenko; Evelyn Pinkerton; Rob van Ginkel; James A Wilson; Louie Rivers; Robyn S Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Do decisions shape preference? Evidence from blind choice.

Authors:  Tali Sharot; Cristina M Velasquez; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-08-02

6.  Is choice-induced preference change long lasting?

Authors:  Tali Sharot; Stephen M Fleming; Xiaoyu Yu; Raphael Koster; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-08-28

7.  Single prolonged stress decreases sign-tracking and cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking.

Authors:  Christopher J Fitzpatrick; Lakshmikripa Jagannathan; Elijah D Lowenstein; Terry E Robinson; Jill B Becker; Jonathan D Morrow
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Parsing Anhedonia: Translational Models of Reward-Processing Deficits in Psychopathology.

Authors:  Michael T Treadway; David H Zald
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-06-01

9.  How choice reveals and shapes expected hedonic outcome.

Authors:  Tali Sharot; Benedetto De Martino; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Pre-existing brain states predict aesthetic judgments.

Authors:  Jaron T Colas; Po-Jang Hsieh
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.