Eric Peter Moll van Charante1, Gerben ter Riet, Patrick Bindels. 1. Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Centre-University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. e.p.mollvancharante@amc.uva.nl
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine self-referrals' motives to visit the accident & emergency departments (AED) and to compare their characteristics to patients contacting the GP cooperative. METHODS: Postal questionnaires were send to AED self-referrals and logistic regression analysis was used to contrast self-referrals to patients contacting the GP cooperative. RESULTS: For a study population of 62,000, during 4 months, 5547 contacts were registered with the GP cooperative, along with 808 AED contacts, 344 of whom (43%) were self-referrals. Main reasons to visit the AED were the perceived need for diagnostic facilities and the conviction that the hospital specialist was best qualified to handle the problem. Dissatisfaction with the GP cooperative among respondents was high. Self-referral to the AED was positively associated with injury, age between 15 and 64, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular and respiratory problems, and distance to the GP centre. CONCLUSION: Self-referrals emerge as patients with a strong preference for the AED, mainly based on assumptions on quality of care and necessary facilities. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: While self-referrals may, in part, make motivated and appropriate choices to visit the AED, new integrated care models should be studied that can adequately deflect those who are eligible for GP care.
OBJECTIVE: To determine self-referrals' motives to visit the accident & emergency departments (AED) and to compare their characteristics to patients contacting the GP cooperative. METHODS: Postal questionnaires were send to AED self-referrals and logistic regression analysis was used to contrast self-referrals to patients contacting the GP cooperative. RESULTS: For a study population of 62,000, during 4 months, 5547 contacts were registered with the GP cooperative, along with 808 AED contacts, 344 of whom (43%) were self-referrals. Main reasons to visit the AED were the perceived need for diagnostic facilities and the conviction that the hospital specialist was best qualified to handle the problem. Dissatisfaction with the GP cooperative among respondents was high. Self-referral to the AED was positively associated with injury, age between 15 and 64, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular and respiratory problems, and distance to the GP centre. CONCLUSION: Self-referrals emerge as patients with a strong preference for the AED, mainly based on assumptions on quality of care and necessary facilities. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: While self-referrals may, in part, make motivated and appropriate choices to visit the AED, new integrated care models should be studied that can adequately deflect those who are eligible for GP care.
Authors: Linda A M J Huibers; Grete Moth; Gunnar T Bondevik; Janko Kersnik; Carola A Huber; Morten B Christensen; Rüdiger Leutgeb; Armando M Casado; Roy Remmen; Michel Wensing Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2011-05-13 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Sara Willems; Wim Peersman; Philippe De Maeyer; Walter Buylaert; Jan De Maeseneer; Peter De Paepe Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2013-09-14 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Janneke de Valk; Elisabeth M Taal; Mariette S Nijhoff; Maren H Harms; Esther Mm Lieshout; Peter Patka; Pleunie Pm Rood Journal: Int J Emerg Med Date: 2014-07-22
Authors: M Christien van der Linden; Robert Lindeboom; Naomi van der Linden; Crispijn L van den Brand; Rianne C Lam; Cees Lucas; Rob de Haan; J Carel Goslings Journal: Int J Emerg Med Date: 2014-07-16