Literature DB >> 18063276

Needlesticks and surgical residents: who is most at risk?

Karen J Brasel1, Christopher Mol, Alex Kolker, John A Weigelt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Exposure to blood-borne diseases remains an occupational risk. Mandates have improved training in how to report exposures for all health-care workers. How exposure rates of surgical residents correlate with experience and mandatory training to reduce risk is not known. It was hypothesized that enhanced training would result in an increased reporting of exposures by surgical trainees and that risk would be greater in the first years of training.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of occupational health records and operative case logs, prospective survey.
METHODS: Occupational Health Services provides both initial and annual training to General Surgery house staff at the Medical College of Wisconsin. Initial training consists of a blood-borne pathogen review and a detailed explanation of exposure reporting. Mandatory annual training is provided during Surgical Grand Rounds. Training was enhanced beginning June 2005 using a videotape outlining surgical risks and specific countermeasures. The numbers of reported exposures per year before and after enhanced training were compared. Exposures were self-reported. As most exposures occurred in the operating room, rate of exposure was calculated for each year of training using the total number of cases done each year reported by the general surgical residents.
RESULTS: Surgical residents reported 118 needlestick injuries over 6 years. Senior and chief residents demonstrated a significantly lower exposure rate than junior residents (nonparametric Mood's median test, p < 0.0001). No significant difference in the injury rate was found per 1000 cases after enhanced training.
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing surgical experience lowered the needlestick injury rate. Assuming no change in self-reporting rates by year, enhanced training and reporting guidelines did not seem to change risk. More specific training for junior residents, as well as passive prevention solutions, may be necessary to positively impact their exposure risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18063276     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  5 in total

1.  Sharps-handling practices among junior surgical residents: a video analysis.

Authors:  David Tso; Monica Langer; Geoff K Blair; Sonia Butterworth
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Accidental blood exposures among emergency medicine residents and young physicians in France: a national survey.

Authors:  Anthony Chauvin; Alice Hutin; Thomas Leredu; Patrick Plaisance; Dominique Pateron; Youri Yordanov
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Occupational Exposure to Blood and Body Fluids among Health Care Workers in Teaching Hospitals in Tehran, Iran.

Authors:  Sh Shokuhi; L Gachkar; I Alavi-Darazam; P Yuhanaee; M Sajadi
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 0.611

4.  Occupational exposures in the operating room: Are surgeons well-equipped?

Authors:  Wilmina N Landford; Ledibabari M Ngaage; Erica Lee; Yvonne Rasko; Robin Yang; Sheri Slezak; Richard Redett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  A systematic review of the effects of resident duty hour restrictions in surgery: impact on resident wellness, training, and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Najma Ahmed; Katharine S Devitt; Itay Keshet; Jonathan Spicer; Kevin Imrie; Liane Feldman; Jonathan Cools-Lartigue; Ahmed Kayssi; Nir Lipsman; Maryam Elmi; Abhaya V Kulkarni; Chris Parshuram; Todd Mainprize; Richard J Warren; Paola Fata; M Sean Gorman; Stan Feinberg; James Rutka
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 12.969

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.