OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to identify clinical and sociodemographic characteristics that may differentiate youth with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) who are resistant to treatment vs those who have a favorable response. METHOD: Participants included 60 outpatients, aged 7-17 years, who were determined to have previously received an adequate trial of a first-line treatment (ie, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, cognitive behavioral therapy). Patients who were treatment-resistant were compared with responders on a number of factors, including severity and nature of OCD symptoms, levels of internalizing and externalizing symptoms, family accommodation of OCD symptoms, and functional impairment. RESULTS: The treatment-resistant group endorsed significantly more obsessions and compulsions, greater levels of internalizing symptoms, higher parental stress related to accommodation, and greater functional impairment than treatment responders. However, relative to treatment-resistant patients, treatment responders reported higher levels of depressive symptoms, perhaps indicating that they were more distressed by their OCD symptoms, as well as greater insight into their symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that youth with more severe symptoms of OCD, higher related parental stress, and greater functional impairment tend to be more resistant to first-line treatments, and that perhaps they may require more intensive or family-based interventions. Treatment responders report more depressive symptoms and insight into their OCD, which may suggest a greater readiness for treatment. Further research likely would help to identify which types of treatment would be most beneficial for individual youth.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to identify clinical and sociodemographic characteristics that may differentiate youth with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) who are resistant to treatment vs those who have a favorable response. METHOD:Participants included 60 outpatients, aged 7-17 years, who were determined to have previously received an adequate trial of a first-line treatment (ie, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, cognitive behavioral therapy). Patients who were treatment-resistant were compared with responders on a number of factors, including severity and nature of OCD symptoms, levels of internalizing and externalizing symptoms, family accommodation of OCD symptoms, and functional impairment. RESULTS: The treatment-resistant group endorsed significantly more obsessions and compulsions, greater levels of internalizing symptoms, higher parental stress related to accommodation, and greater functional impairment than treatment responders. However, relative to treatment-resistant patients, treatment responders reported higher levels of depressive symptoms, perhaps indicating that they were more distressed by their OCD symptoms, as well as greater insight into their symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that youth with more severe symptoms of OCD, higher related parental stress, and greater functional impairment tend to be more resistant to first-line treatments, and that perhaps they may require more intensive or family-based interventions. Treatment responders report more depressive symptoms and insight into their OCD, which may suggest a greater readiness for treatment. Further research likely would help to identify which types of treatment would be most beneficial for individual youth.