Literature DB >> 18063012

Soil monitoring in Europe: a review of existing systems and requirements for harmonisation.

X Morvan1, N P A Saby, D Arrouays, C Le Bas, R J A Jones, F G A Verheijen, P H Bellamy, M Stephens, M G Kibblewhite.   

Abstract

Official frameworks for soil monitoring exist in most member states of the European Union. However, the uniformity of methodologies and the scope of actual monitoring are variable between national systems. This review identifies the differences between existing systems, and describes options for harmonising soil monitoring in the Member States and some neighbouring countries of the European Union. The present geographical coverage is uneven between and within countries. In general, national and regional networks are much denser in northern and eastern regions than in southern Europe. The median coverage in the 50 km x 50 km EMEP cells applied all over the European Union, is 300 km(2) for one monitoring site. Achieving such minimum density for the European Union would require 4100 new sites, mainly located in southern countries (Italy, Spain, Greece), parts of Poland, Germany, the Baltic countries, Norway, Finland and France. Options are discussed for harmonisation of site density, considering various risk area and soil quality indicator requirements.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18063012     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.10.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  9 in total

1.  The role of metadata and strategies to detect and control temporal data bias in environmental monitoring of soil contamination.

Authors:  André Desaules
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Determinants of the distribution of nitrogen-cycling microbial communities at the landscape scale.

Authors:  D Bru; A Ramette; N P A Saby; S Dequiedt; L Ranjard; C Jolivet; D Arrouays; L Philippot
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Testing the indicative value of magnetic susceptibility measurements for concluding on site potentials and risks provoked by fly ash deposition.

Authors:  C Fürst; C Lorz; D Zirlewagen; F Makeschin
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Measurement instability and temporal bias in chemical soil monitoring: sources and control measures.

Authors:  André Desaules
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  The LUCAS topsoil database and derived information on the regional variability of cropland topsoil properties in the European Union.

Authors:  Gergely Tóth; Arwyn Jones; Luca Montanarella
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Multivariate spatial analyses of the distribution and origin of trace and major elements in soils surrounding a secondary lead smelter.

Authors:  Arnaud R Schneider; Xavier Morvan; Nicolas P A Saby; Benjamin Cancès; Marie Ponthieu; Maxime Gommeaux; Béatrice Marin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Monitoring soil for sustainable development and land degradation neutrality.

Authors:  Gergely Tóth; Tamás Hermann; Manuela Ravina da Silva; Luca Montanarella
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Identification of long-term trends and seasonality in high-frequency water quality data from the Yangtze River basin, China.

Authors:  Weili Duan; Bin He; Yaning Chen; Shan Zou; Yi Wang; Daniel Nover; Wen Chen; Guishan Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  How to measure, report and verify soil carbon change to realize the potential of soil carbon sequestration for atmospheric greenhouse gas removal.

Authors:  Pete Smith; Jean-Francois Soussana; Denis Angers; Louis Schipper; Claire Chenu; Daniel P Rasse; Niels H Batjes; Fenny van Egmond; Stephen McNeill; Matthias Kuhnert; Cristina Arias-Navarro; Jorgen E Olesen; Ngonidzashe Chirinda; Dario Fornara; Eva Wollenberg; Jorge Álvaro-Fuentes; Alberto Sanz-Cobena; Katja Klumpp
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-10-06       Impact factor: 10.863

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.