Literature DB >> 18062848

Uncertainty and the influence of group norms in the attitude-behaviour relationship.

Joanne R Smith1, Michael A Hogg, Robin Martin, Deborah J Terry.   

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to examine the impact of subjective uncertainty on conformity to group norms in the attitude-behaviour context. In both studies, subjective uncertainty was manipulated using a deliberative mindset manipulation (McGregor, Zanna, Holmes, & Spencer, 2001). In Study 1 (N=106), participants were exposed to either an attitude-congruent or an attitude-incongruent in-group norm. In Study 2 (N=83), participants were exposed to either a congruent, incongruent, or an ambiguous in-group norm. Ranges of attitude-behaviour outcomes, including attitude-intention consistency and change in attitude-certainty, were assessed. In both studies, levels of group-normative behaviour varied as a function of uncertainty condition. In Study 1, conformity to group norms, as evidenced by variations in the level of attitude-intention consistency, was observed only in the high uncertainty condition. In Study 2, exposure to an ambiguous norm had different effects for those in the low and the high uncertainty conditions. In the low uncertainty condition, greatest conformity was observed in the attitude-congruent norm condition compared with an attitude-congruent or ambiguous norm. In contrast, individuals in the high uncertainty condition displayed greatest conformity when exposed to either an attitude-congruent or an ambiguous in-group norm. The implications of these results for the role of subjective uncertainty in social influence processes are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18062848     DOI: 10.1348/014466606X164439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0144-6665


  11 in total

1.  Social Norms: Do We Love Norms Too Much?

Authors:  David C Bell; Mary L Cox
Journal:  J Fam Theory Rev       Date:  2015-03-01

2.  Investigating the impact of eating norms and collective autonomy support vs. collective control on unhealthy eating and its internalization.

Authors:  Nada Kadhim; Catherine E Amiot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Social expectations bias decision-making in uncertain inter-personal situations.

Authors:  María Ruz; Anna Moser; Kristin Webster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Leading teams during simulated pediatric emergencies: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ester H Coolen; Jos M Draaisma; Sabien den Hamer; Jan L Loeffen
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2015-01-06

5.  The Expression and Transfer of Valence Associated with Social Conformity.

Authors:  Prachi Mistry; Mimi Liljeholm
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Human Group Presence, Group Characteristics, and Group Norms Affect Human-Robot Interaction in Naturalistic Settings.

Authors:  Marlena R Fraune; Selma Šabanović; Takayuki Kanda
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2019-06-27

7.  Sensitivity to social norm violation is related to political orientation.

Authors:  Élise Désilets; Benoit Brisson; Sébastien Hétu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Selfless or Selfish? The impact of message framing and egoistic motivation on narcissists' compliance with preventive health behaviors during COVID-19.

Authors:  Tobias Otterbring; Alexandra Festila; Michał Folwarczny
Journal:  Curr Res Ecol Soc Psychol       Date:  2021-11-22

9.  Liking food less: the impact of social influence on food liking evaluations in female students.

Authors:  Eric Robinson; Suzanne Higgs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Gender norms and social norms: differences, similarities and why they matter in prevention science.

Authors:  Beniamino Cislaghi; Lori Heise
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2019-12-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.